Brexiteer May gets lip-service from Trump and Turkish promises from Erdogan

Washington D.C., 27 January 2017. The British Prime Minister Teresa May and the US President Donald Trump held a joint press conference after their meeting at the White House. (Foto: UK Government work).

Washington D.C., 27 January 2017. The British Prime Minister Teresa May and the US President Donald Trump held a joint press conference after their meeting at the White House. (Foto: UK Government work).

The rush announcement of a fabulous trade deal with the US, which ,Teresa May, the British Prime Minister sought last week in Washington D.C., didn’t materialize. As for the much advertised ‘special relationship’ between the US and Britain, it will bear no economic meaning whatsoever, at least in the foreseeable future. The governing Brexiteers in London desperately look for somewhere to lean on after they dragged their country out of the EU, to set sail alone in rough high seas. Donald Trump seemed ready to offer mere tokens, like a very brief hand holding, which his guest can’t easily sell to her internal audience. May is the first foreign leader who the newly installed tenant received in the White House.

Such meaningless gestures though, do not impress mainland Europeans, who are ready to decisively get rid of Britain once and for all. Undoubtedly, the cost to Britain will be much larger than what the EU will lose after Brexit. May, however, might have believed the Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan, who promised to replace Europe as a trade partner of Britain. Let’s take one thing at a time.

Hollow promises

All the experts agree that a future US – Britain free trade deal, if and when it is to be applied, cannot offer even a small fraction of the economic weight, which the EU internal market did for the British economy in general and the London City financiers in particular. Actually, what Trump promised was that Britain is to keep the trade arrangement the UK already has as an EU full member state. On top of that, Britain is a European economy with strong social, environmental and public health protection features, which will certainly create overwhelming problems in drafting a bilateral free trade deal with Trump’s America. As for the geostrategic aspect, it’s not a secret that during the past many decades Britain – despite some intelligence sharing that the US carefully controls – was considered by Washington as a compliant subordinate state, watching for the American interests in Europe.

Last Friday, controlled and cautious Teresa May, when meeting with unpredictable, uninhibited and impulsive Donald Trump, surely didn’t discuss only what elusively bonds their two countries. The British PM raised the Moscow ‘question’ and told her interlocutor that Putin’s resurgent Russia constitutes a escalating threat for the West. She also told him that the days of the joint American-British interventions to sovereign countries are over. It’s not at all sure if Trump agreed to all that. Their common political origin from the populist platform of anti-globalization and anti-establishment is not enough to offer fertile ground for a productive new partnership. The opposite is probably true. Their populist rhetoric prevents them from being generous and open.

Trade in detail

In detail now, it’s highly improbable that Trump would grant free access to the US market for cars or Rolls-Royce aircraft engines produced in Britain. In reality, a further reduction of the already minimal import duties will mean nothing to Britain. On top of that, the US is the only advanced industrial country, where Britain exports to a bit more than it imports from. So, given this state of affairs in their trade balance, the US is the party justified to demand further trade concessions from Britain, not the other way around.

In reality then, May’s trip to meet Trump was more of a desperate cry for help in her difficult divorce procedure with the EU, rather than a real prospect for a good trade deal for Britain. Unfortunately, May only got President’s praise for her country having voted for Brexit. At this point, Trump didn’t miss the opportunity to praise himself once more, for having correctly predicted the outcome of the June 2016 referendum.

In conclusion then, the British PM got a lot of empty words about this void of content ‘special relationship’, but not a solid promise or clear remark concerning the much wanted free trade agreement. According to an announcement by May’s spokeswoman late last Saturday, all Trump promised was that Britain will have the same trade regime with the US after leaving the EU as of today, still being an EU full member state! This means Britain cannot expect from the US more than it already has. Strangely enough, the PM’s aide meant it as a major gain!

Turkish support

As it turned out, May got more from Turkey, where she flew directly from the US on Saturday. Her spokeswoman stated that this odd country is ready to set up a working group to prepare a free trade deal with Britain right away. Undoubtedly, this is a standard Turkish lip service and all together it’s much less than what Downing Street expected from last week’s trips around half the globe. As for the hand holding between Trump and May, it cost nothing to the American and will offer her very little comfort at home. Not to forget, that she will be obliged to pass her hard Brexit proposal in an overwhelmingly hostile Parliament.

After the final ruling of the British Supreme Court, the government is obliged to get the Parliament’s approval for the country to exit from the European Union. This has to be done soon, if London is to honor its pledges to the other EU member states, so that the Brexit application will officially reach Brussels in March. The problem is that the vast majority of the MPs are well known Brimainers. It will be very strange if they will just succumb to the result of the referendum, without discussing and even formulating the kind and the terms of the Brexit their government is to negotiate with mainland Europeans.

The Parliament test

Already, there is strong criticism of May’s trip to the US. Both British and other European political leaders scorned her for ‘selling’ Britain cheaply to the Americans. May, with her trip to the US, aimed at something much more tangible than a hand holding and a reassurance about the ‘special relation’. She desperately and urgently needs concrete support from Trump’s US, in order to strengthen her card in the Commons and the negotiations table in Brussels. Instead of that, what she brought back home yesterday to Downing Street was Erdogan’s reassurance that he will start ‘buying British’. Is this a help or a political burden?

Certainly, Teresa May’s trips around half the globe last week are the latest stopovers of her hasten round of official visits to get pledges about future trade deals. Alas, every first year student of international relations knows that if it’s the need that knocks on the door, the answer is usually ‘no’. If it’s a ‘yes’ it may turn out to be even more costly. And May is now learning this lesson the hard way.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

WEF Davos 2016 LIVE: “You just don’t know if the oil price will be 20$ or 100$ in the next 2-3 years!” top Harvard economist Kenneth Rogoff underscores from Davos

What we take for granted: The EU is not perfect

IMF: How can Eurozone avoid stagnation

Close to 7,000 evacuated from Syrian towns after enduring nearly 3-year siege

Is Eurozone preparing to abandon austerity and stagnation?

Force used against protestors in Gaza ‘wholly disproportionate’ says UN human rights chief

The rise of alternative medical practices in modern sports

Look Mom, even the House of Lords says the #righttobeforgotten is not right

EU: 13 major banks may pay fines 10% of worldwide turnover

Car clocking: MEPs call for new legislation to combat odometer fraud

10th ASEM in Milan and the importance of being one: EU’s big challenge on the way to China

The EU Commission fails to draw the right conclusions about corruption

Does research make sense any more? The dire need for new ways to measure success

EU leads the torn away South Sudan to a new bloody civil war

China’s cities are rapidly becoming more competitive. Here’s why

JADE Testimonial #3: Sebastian @ Fundraising

Draghi will not hesitate to zero ECB’s basic interest rate

Travel the world, find yourself

The Franco-German axis considers that all EU needs now is more armaments

Trump goes ahead with plan to undo globalization; targets China and EU

We’ll succeed together

The Bavarians threaten Berlin and Brussels with immigration crisis

Mobile 360 Series – Russia & CIS: Empowering the Digital Economy

Rights experts call for greater protection of indigenous people during migration

Mental health of health professionals: the alter ego

The ECB ‘accidentally’ followed IMF‘s policy advice for growth and job creation by printing more money

UN, Egypt help avert another Israel-Palestine war in Gaza that was ‘minutes away’, Security Council hears

Bankruptcy or referendum: which one is going to be first?

Samsung’s profits fall as cheaper smartphones gain market share

Europe should make voice ‘more heard’ in today’s ‘dangerous world,’ says UN chief

Can Kiev make face to mounting economic problems and social unrest?

FEATURE: Niger’s girls find sanctuary in fistula treatment centres

Is the EU denying its social character favouring a banking conglomerate?

Facebook and Google to treat Europe as the 51st State of the USA

Why Eurozone can afford spending for growth

Let’s Learn

IMF v Germany: Eurogroup keeps the fight under control

Military escalation will have ‘serious consequences’ for Yemeni civilians, warns UN Special Envoy

Brexit Update: EU endorses unprecedented compromise to help Cameron out of the referendum mess he got himself into

Commission presents far-reaching anti-tax evasion measures

Merkel, Mercedes and Volkswagen to abolish European democracy

Trying to cure bank cancer with analgesics

EU elections: The louder the threats and the doomsaying the heavier the weight of the vote

Resolving banks with depositors’ money?

CDU-SPD agree the terms for EU’s Banking Union

What would happen if we removed cars from cities?

GSMA announces first speakers for Mobile 360 Series-Middle East and North Africa

Discovering Europe: Free EU rail pass for 18 year olds

Heat-resistant crops, ‘green’ infrastructure, can prepare Near East and North Africa to better tackle droughts – UN agency

Lagarde’s metamorphoses, not a laughing matter

JADE @ European Business Summit 2014: Youth Unemployment – a drive to Entrepreneurship

It’s not kids’ screen time you should worry about – it’s yours

VW emissions scandal: EU unable to protect its consumers against large multinationals

Lithuania should find its own way in the EU

The Commission sees ‘moderate recovery’ but prospects deteriorate

20th EU-China Summit in Beijing, 16/07/2018

6 ways to ensure AI and new tech works for – not against – humanity

New UN agriculture agency report underscores value of fishing in fight against global hunger

What the world will look like after the Iran and 5+1 deal; the US emerges as major power broker in Middle East

Press conference by EC Vice-Presidents Valdis Dombrovskis (left) and Jyrki Katainen, on the Commission's proposals in the framework of the financial union (Source: EC Audiovisual Services / Copyright: EU, 2018 / Photo by Georges Boulougouris)

EU Finance ministers agree on new banking capital rules and move closer to Banking Union

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s