Is there a de facto impossibility for the Brexit to kick-start?

European Council - June 2016. EU Heads of State or Government met on 28 June 2016 in Brussels. Over dinner the Heads of State or Government discussed the outcome of the referendum in the United Kingdom with Prime Minister Cameron (first from right). Here Cameron is pictured with the German Chancellor Angela Merkel and the Prime minister of Luxembourg Xavier Bettel. (Shoot location: Brussels – Belgium. Shoot date: 28/06/2016. Copyright: 'The European Union').

European Council – June 2016. EU Heads of State or Government met on 28 June 2016 in Brussels. Over dinner the Heads of State or Government discussed the outcome of the referendum in the United Kingdom with Prime Minister David Cameron (first from right). Here Cameron is pictured with the German Chancellor Angela Merkel and the Prime minister of Luxembourg Xavier Bettel. (Shoot location: Brussels – Belgium. Shoot date: 28/06/2016. Copyright: ‘The European Union’).

Quite understandably, the European Union leaders including of course the German Chancellor Angela Merkel, the French President Francois Hollande and the EU Commission leader Jean-Claude Juncker, want a swift and stern Brexit. The reports about a Franco-German split, with a fictitious Berlin tolerance and the Paris harshness, do not hold water. The France-Germany axis must presently appear stronger than ever, if the EU is to endure without vital losses, relating to the unthinkable before first exit of a member state of the size of Britain.

The 27+1 EU leaders in last Tuesday’s meeting of the European Council told the British Prime Minister David Cameron who typically attended only the first day, that his country has to be quick in resolving the political and financial calamity the Brexit vote has triggered. Merkel, Hollande and Juncker, although in differing wording, were adamant that the chaos has to be confronted and it’s Britain that has to start the ball rolling, by applying for a Brexit along the lines of the article 50 of the Treaty of the European Union.

Hard pressed Britain

This is the only legal and orderly way for a country to quit the EU. After Cameron left the meeting room for London, the 27 continued their meeting on Wednesday and they cemented what had already been clarified; that the ball is in the British court and London has to be quick and punctual in implementing swiftly the people’s decision for Brexit. Of course, the issue is much more complicated than that. Let’s check where things stand now.

The two sides have actually started the divorce negotiations, by throwing the ball to each other’s court. Not at all an unusual reality, even for the simplest uncoupling. As mentioned above, the EU side is pressing for a swift start of the separation procedure and solemnly demands that Britain now signs  the ‘leave’ epistle. In the British side, things are much more complicated though, to say the least. Last Monday, Cameron told the House of Commons that no British government can ask for a break-up with the EU, before having secured a clear agreement base, about what kind of relationship will follow the separation.

London in dire straights

Obviously, this is quite the opposite the mainland Europeans are soliciting from London. Paris, Berlin and Brussels insist that no negotiation can start about shaping the future relationship between Britain and the EU, before Brussels gets the divorce letter. The French government is the most unbending on that. Francois Hollande coming to Tuesday’s Council went as far as to say that “I can’t imagine any British government would not respect the choice of its own people.”

This is a hit below the belt, because it implies that the British government is actually considering the option not to respect the outcome of the referendum, at least for quite some time. In a way, Hollande tells Cameron not to act like the Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras, who last August did exactly the opposite than what 63% of the Greeks had endorsed some days before in the July referendum. Jean-Claude Juncker issued similar threats last Tuesday speaking in the European Parliament, by clearly stating that “no notification (for Brexit) no negotiation”. The Dutch PM Mark Rutte went even further and brandished a doomsday nightmare for Britain, by saying that “England had collapsed politically, monetarily, constitutionally and economically”. Mind you, he spoke about England, not the UK, with an obvious reference to the possibility of Scotland and Northern Ireland leaving the UK.

The UK in chaos

It’s pretty clear then that the Europeans are currently demanding something that London is unable to deliver, at least not in the foreseeable future. There are two insurmountable obstacles to that. For one thing, the Cameron government is a kind of caretaker administration, until the Conservative Party elects this fall its new leader and of course a new Prime Minister.

The second overwhelming problem for London, if it was to send the divorce letter, is that the British political scenery has fallen to pieces. The old divisions between left and right or Labour and Conservatives, is now transformed into ‘pro’ and ‘anti’ EU. This new division has not only profoundly divided the two major political parties, but it has deeply penetrated  into British society. To be noted, that Jeremy Corbyn, the leader of the Labour Party, has lost a confidence vote within the party’s parliamentary group but refused to resign.

The House of Commons cannot deliver

Let’s see what are the odds about the Cameron government introducing in the House of Commons a draft law, that is the famous divorce letter the EU demands, to energize Article 50 of the European Treaty for the Brexit. The first problem is that a caretaker government cannot take such a historical decision. Even if it did though, the House of Commons would surely be unable to pass it, because it is made up by an overwhelming majority of pro-EU MPs. The pro-EU political ‘party’ is now by far the largest force in the Parliament, horizontally crossing the old political regions, except Nigel Farage’s UKIP. This is in direct contradiction with the 23 June vote, further escalating the absolute political confusion in the country.

But still, even if the majority of the Labour and the Tory MPs decided to capitulate to the will of the people, as expressed in the 23 June referendum, there would be unseen before implications, coming from the Scottish and the Northern Irish MPs. Both ‘governments’ of the two constituent but ‘independent’ parts of the United Kingdom have declared, that they will definitely remain in the EU, if Britain decided to leave, if needed by breaking off from the UK. Understandably, the MPs representing these ‘countries’ would not participate in a procedure of the House of Commons that may lead to a Brexit. It’s not clear what those MPs will do in such an eventuality.

The EU to pay a great cost also

All those problems are of course known to the main land European dignitaries. However, they cannot adopt a soft and perceptive policy stance towards Britain. This is so, very simply because a mild attitude would strengthen the Eurosceptic political forces in the national level and support the centrifuge tendencies in the EU27.

On top of that, the mainland Europe political leaders have observed over the last few days, that the capital markets in this side of the English Channel are paying a higher price for the Brexit vote, than the London financial platforms. Even the yield of the British government bonds, the Guilds, has dropped to 1%, as if investors are queuing in order to lend more money to Britain. Even the fall of the GBP in relation to the dollar and the euro is seen as an extra support to the British exports of goods and services.

No wonder then why Hollande is the most fervent advocate of a swift solution to the chaos caused by the Brexit vote. For many reasons France is more exposed to related risks than Germany. Unfortunately, the prospects for a quick and swift Brexit are nonexistent and Europe is to withstand and pay the price for a lengthy and totally misty phase of negotiations. Even worse, it’s completely vague how those discussions can be kick-started. Not to forget that the results of the 23 June referendum bind the government only politically not legally, to implement the Brexit.

 

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

Basel III rules relaxed: Banks got it all but become more prone to crisis

Gender Equality as a platform to improve Medicine

Why Eurozone’s problems may end in a few months

European Youth Forum welcomes the European Commission’s proposed revision of the Union Code on Visas, however it does not go far enough

A Valentine’s Special: heart has nothing to do with it, it’s all Brain

Brexit Update: EU endorses unprecedented compromise to help Cameron out of the referendum mess he got himself into

“The markets have moved on renewables, policy makers must keep up”, A Sting Exclusive by Erik Solheim, Head of UN Environment

The G7 adopted dangerous views about Ukraine and Greece

More unemployment and lower wages to make European workers competitive?

Ukraine-EU deal sees the light but there’s no defeat for Russia

EU and African leaders to jointly tackle the migration crisis across the Mediterranean

EU to spend €6 billion on youth employment and training futile schemes

ECB to buy corporate bonds: Will government financing be the next step?

Economic recovery won’t tackle youth unemployment problem

Post-Brexit muddled times: the resignation of UK’s top ambassador and Theresa May’s vague plans

Fair completion rules and the law of gravity don’t apply to banks

Italy can stand the US rating agencies’ meaningless degrading

The European giant tourism sector in constant growth

A Sting Exclusive: “Our ambition is by 2020 Indonesia to become an emerging power of World’s Maritime Access”, reveals the Chargé d’Affaires at the Embassy of Indonesia in Brussels, treating WEF, ASEAN and EU-Indonesia relations on the eve of the World Economic Forum East Asia 2015 in Jakarta

Why lay people don’t expect anything good from G20

Why is Merkel’s Germany so liberal with the refugees? Did the last elections change that?

Russia won’t let Ukraine drift westwards in one piece

Eurozone: Negative statistics bring deflation and recession closer

No tears for Cyprus in Brussels and Moscow

Climate change and health: creating global awareness and using earth resources wisely

Global Citizen – Volunteer Internships

The EU stops being soft with 10 Downing Street about Brexit

Court of Auditors: EU spending infested with errors well above the materiality threshold of 2%

The three sins the EU committed in 2015

G20 LIVE: G20 Leaders’ Communiqué Antalya Summit, 15-16 November 2015

The European Parliament rewrites the EU budget in a bright day for the Union

EU members commit to build an integrated gas market and finally cut dependency on Russia

European Junior Enterprises to address the significant skills mismatch in the EU between school and employment

The Eurogroup offered a cold reception to IMF’s director for Europe

EU budget: Will Germany alone manage Britain’s gap?

From inconvenience to opportunity: the importance of international medical exchanges

Turkey presents a new strategy for EU accession but foreign policy could be the lucky card

The EU cuts roaming charges further while the UK weighs Brexit impact

How will EU look after French, Dutch and German Elections and what will be the implications for Youth Entrepreneurship?

IMF’s Lagarde to Peoples of the world: You have to work more for the banks!

Mental Health: starting with myself

IMF: How can Eurozone avoid stagnation

Progress in medical research: leading or lagging behind?

iSting: Change Europe with your Writing

19th EU-China Summit: A historical advance in the Chino-European rapprochement

EU-India summit: Will the EU manage to sign a free trade agreement with India before Britain?

Environmental labelling, information and management schemes are central to the circular economy

The ECB still protects the banks at the expense of the EU taxpayers

IMF: Sorry Greece, Ireland, Portugal we were wrong!

How wealthy people transmit this advantage to their children and grand children

European Youth Forum demands immediate action & binding agreement on climate change

Doctors vs. Industry 4.0: who will win?

Draghi will not hesitate to zero ECB’s basic interest rate

EU Commission – US hasten talks to avoid NGO reactions on free trade agreement

China’s New Normal and Its Relevance to the EU

SPB TV @ MWC14: The TV of the Future

Eurostat: Real unemployment double than the official rate

Creating shared value: an opportunity and challenge for entrepreneurship

WEF Davos 2016 LIVE: “We need more Schengen but reinforce control!”, France’s Minister of Economy Emmanuel Macron emphasises from Davos

EU is now giving Google new monopolies to the detriment of European citizens and Internet companies

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s