The UK referendum has already damaged Europe: even a ‘remain’ result is not without cost to Britain and the EU

Bilateral meeting Tusk-Cameron. David Cameron, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom (on the right) received Donald Tusk, President of the European Council in London. Shoot location: London. Shoot date: 04/02/2016. (European Council – Council of the European Union Audiovisual Services).

Bilateral meeting Tusk-Cameron. David Cameron, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom (on the right) received Donald Tusk, President of the European Council, in London. Shoot location: London. Shoot date: 04/02/2016. (European Council – Council of the European Union Audiovisual Services).

The adult Brits are deciding today about their country’s position in or out the European Union, in a referendum that Prime Minister David Cameron was forced by his party’s ultra-Eurosceptics in January 2013 to promise to conduct it, should the Conservative Party win a majority in the 2015 legislative election. This promise was then thought it could secure a clear Tory victory and an absolute majority in the general elections of May 2015.

The absolute majority was actually achieved and Cameron won an electoral triumph, but still it’s not clear if the promise was needed. This kind of debate will surely follow whatever the outcome of today’s vote. As things stand now, the referendum will decide if Europe will continue united or Britain follows a separate way. There is more to it though.

Counting the cost

The cost of a Brexit may vary from a short run shrinking plus a long term recession of the British economy, to a global ‘Black Friday’ in the capital and money markets. Such a prospect can easily trigger a new financial black out, with the banks stopping to lend each other, until it becomes clear who is exposed to what risks. In this way, the western financial system may freeze for quite some time, with unpredictable repercussions to the real economy, an actual Armageddon, just like the 2008-2010 crash. It was like that in 2008, when Lehman Brothers went bust. Apparently, the heated discussion about who is to blame for a Brexit will encompass all the costly effects of such an unfavorable possibility.

That is why the whole world issued advice for Britain to stay in the EU, while many authoritative entities aired threats should the Britons choose ‘leave’. From the IMF, the OECD, the Bank of England, the Fed, the western banking conglomerates to the Washington, Berlin and Paris administrations, all stated how dangerous it is to try reshaping the world, after Britain chooses to sail alone in the open seas.

Reshaping the world

Unquestionably, Britain is a global player. Consequently, its repositioning in relation with the EU would have upshots spanning from a possible financial black out, to geostrategic reordering, none of which would be a smooth or peaceful process. In view of the cost of a possible Brexit, David Cameron decided to lead the ‘remain’ campaign. Quite understandably, he pondered all the dangers his country will be exposed to, if his 2013 promise turns sour. All along the past few months he fought to the best of his abilities for the ‘remain’ vote. He even went as far as to state that his government has not drafted a fully fledged contingency plan for the ‘leave’ eventuality.

George Osborn, the Chancellor of the Exchequer when asked last Monday, if he would think about stopping the transactions in the London Stock Exchange, if the market goes wild on Friday after a possible ‘leave’ vote on Thursday, he said “The Bank of England Governor Mark Carney and myself, have, of course, discussed contingency plans, but the sensible thing is to keep those secret and make sure you are well prepared for whatever happens.” He clarified though that “the government did not have a wider contingency plan for the UK beyond the immediate impact of a Leave vote” and solemnly added, “such plans can’t protect people from the shock” that would follow.

The cost of ‘leave’

In short, the London government told the Britons that there is no way to protect them from what is to follow, if they decide to ‘leave’. This was a very farfetched statement tantamount to an ultimate menace. Given that Osborn couldn’t utter such a threat without Cameron’s OK, it’s obvious that the British Prime Minister has used all the possible and even impossible means, to convince his compatriots to vote ‘stay’ and save him from the ordeal which may follow. Obviously, he dreads the ultimate consequences of his 2013 ‘promise’, which gave him an unexpected electoral victory, but may now drive his country to the rocks.

In many respects, the blame game in a possible ‘leave’ outcome, has already begun. The leader of the Labour Party, Jeremy Corbyn, has triggered it. He was never an EU ‘lover’ as he has repeatedly said, but clearly he supported the ‘remain’ side, although in a lukewarm political way. In this respect then his statement that he “wouldn’t take the blame of a possible ‘leave’ result” has de facto started this discussion.

The ‘remain’ also costs

As for the ‘remain’ probable result in today’s vote there is not much to say. Britain has got what Cameron asked for a few months ago. He negotiated that with the German Chancellor Angela Merkel and the French President Francois Hollande, when the three traded the terms for Cameron to assume the leadership of the ‘remain’ campaign. This was mainly a four years block of social benefit payments to immigrants from other EU countries, working in Britain. There would be nothing more for Britain, if the country decides to stay in the EU.

However there is more to Wolfgang Schäuble’s threat that “it’s either in or out”. He obviously meant that Britain in case of a ‘leave’ outcome won’t get a free trade agreement like Swiss or Norway. This was two weeks ago. Last Monday though, Schäuble left it to be understood that even a ‘stay’ outcome won’t be without repercussions for Britain. According to Brussels sources, Cameron’s decision to ‘promise’ in 2013 this in-out the EU referendum in order to win a general election, is not forgotten. A lot of people in Berlin, Paris, Rome and Brussels are furious about the easiness of the Brits to keep constantly ‘rethinking’ their participation in the EU.

Problems for Britain even if it ‘remains’

This British attitude is not without cost to the EU as a whole. Even a ‘remain’ outcome won’t completely cure the trauma inflicted to EU’s status by the UK challenge. So there would be problems even in the ‘remain’ event. In the future, the British demands for ‘special treatment’ will be briefly denied and London will have difficulties in the day to day business with Brussels.

Undoubtedly, there is a lot in this line, especially given the way the London financial markets and the banks work, as if the country was a real off shore state. If the Brussels bureaucracy, with only 4% Britons, decides to create problems to Britain, the sky will be the limit.

More in the British path?

On top of that, Cameron’s idea to risk the full EU membership of his country in order to just win an election may, and very probably will, open the appetite of certain political formations in Europe to do the same. That is to say, promising referendums about their country’s participation in the EU, in order to win an election. In Italy the Five Star Movement of Beppe Grillo, in France the National Front of Marine Le Pen, in Germany the AfD and other Eurosceptic extreme right, left or harlequin parties are surely getting similar ideas.

Then, it will be the end of the entire European edifice, and the national divisions will bring the Old Continent more than one hundred years back, to the era of the pre 1914 WWI period. Can the world stand it? Seemingly, Cameron didn’t think much about all that, when in January 2013 he ‘promised’ the in-out the EU referendum. A lot of elite people in Europe and elsewhere do not forget it.

As a result, not without reason, Cameron has avowed that he won’t contest a new term as Prime Minister and he will quit the leadership of his party before the next general election. His successors for the Tory leadership have started to compete. The ‘leave’ campaign helped Michael Gove, the No2 in the Tory leave camp, to challenge Boris Johnson, until recently the more probable successor of Cameron.

Finally, going back to today’s possible outcomes, a ‘remain’ result will be handled within known and well charted waters, while the ‘leave’ is to open Pandora’s Box, to say the least.

Advertising

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

This is how we can empower 8 billion minds by 2030

Why financial services can kickstart Africa’s digital economy

Chart of the day: The internet has a language diversity problem

With potential to boost profits by up to 20 per cent, a woman’s place is at work, says UN labour agency

The world wide web is 30. Here are 8 things you should know about it

Yemen: Security Council backs new mission in support of key port city truce

EU budget: Commission proposes major funding increase for stronger borders and migration

How Britain’s backyard bird feeders are shaping evolution

Back to the future: flying cars are becoming a reality

Dignified and non-discriminatory heath care: does anyone even know what it means?

In Tanzania, UN refugee chief praises ‘regional peacemaker’ role, and efforts to welcome neighbours on the run

Further reforms will promote a stronger and more inclusive Hungarian economy

Antitrust: Commission fines Google €4.34 billion for illegal practices regarding Android mobile devices to strengthen dominance of Google’s search engine

The European Commission and EU consumer authorities publish final assessment of dialogue with Volkswagen

UN News 2018 Recap: In Case You Missed It

This is why attractive cities do better economically

COVID19 Pandemic: The Mental Health of Colored Chicks

New Erasmus: more opportunities for disadvantaged youth

Six children among 53 confirmed fatalities after Libya detention centre airstrikes: Security Council condemns attack

Sustainable fishing staying afloat in developed world, sinking in poorer regions

‘We are facing a learning crisis’, UN chief warns on International Youth Day

EU growth in 2015 to be again sluggish; Can the Juncker Commission fight this out?

Why Microsoft is a regular to Almunia’s

Why the world needs systems leadership, not selfish leadership

Migration crisis update: The “Habsburg Empire” comes back to life while EU loses control

The price of centralization of human resources for health

“Working together to make a change at the COP 21 in Paris”, an article by Ambassador Yang of the Chinese Mission to EU

Germany is the world’s most innovative economy

OECD household income up 0.7% in first quarter of 2018, outpacing GDP growth

Technology is a force for peace and prosperity. Don’t let its challenges obscure this

A Sting Exclusive: “Digital and mobile technologies are helping to achieve an economic success in Spain”, the Spanish Secretary of State for Telecommunications and Information Society Víctor Calvo-Sotelo reveals to the Sting at Mobile World Congress 2015

The Brexit factor in the US-China trade war and other conflicts

Hungary’s emergency measures: MEPs ask EU to impose sanctions and stop payments

A Sting Exclusive: “There can be no global deal on emissions without China and the USA”, Conservative MEP Ian Duncan stresses from Brussels

Turning challenge into opportunity on the course to becoming the first climate-neutral continent

Coronavirus: EU guidance for a safe return to the workplace

Doctors are humans too: the benefits of embracing your mental status

Trade is not a weapon. Let’s not use it as one

The staggering loss of the Arctic Ocean’s oldest sea ice shown in time-lapse

Coronavirus vs flu: how do they compare?

Climate change recognized as ‘threat multiplier’, UN Security Council debates its impact on peace

Ebola outbreak in DR Congo declared over, now let’s tackle other health challenges: WHO chief

Asylum: deal to update EU fingerprinting database

Relieving the suffering of dying: Home Palliative Care as a spiritual coping strategy

IMF: The near-term outlook for the U.S. economy is one of strong growth and job creation

MWC 2016 Live: Industrial world prepares to reap digital benefits

EU continues targeting on Chinese steel imports instead of the revival of its own economy

What the global Internet’s stakeholders can learn from Europe’s new data law

EU to finance new investment projects with extra borrowing; French and Italian deficits to be tolerated

IMF’s Lagarde: Estimating Cyber Risk for the Financial Sector

Reading this alone? Recent surveys reveal the curious truth about loneliness

UN chief announces progress on committee to shape Syria’s political future

These are the countries where it’s still illegal to get an abortion

Remembering slave trade offers chance to raise awareness, ‘oppose all forms of modern slavery’ – UNESCO

Immigrant integration policies have improved but challenges remain

Scientists now think air pollution is fuelling violent crime

A new world that demands new doctors in the fourth industrial revolution

Is there a chance for the West to win the war on terror?

Mainland Europe adopts Germanic cartel business patterns

Nicaragua crisis: One year in, more than 60,000 have fled, seeking refuge

More Stings?

Advertising

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s