The UK referendum has already damaged Europe: even a ‘remain’ result is not without cost to Britain and the EU

Bilateral meeting Tusk-Cameron. David Cameron, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom (on the right) received Donald Tusk, President of the European Council in London. Shoot location: London. Shoot date: 04/02/2016. (European Council – Council of the European Union Audiovisual Services).

Bilateral meeting Tusk-Cameron. David Cameron, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom (on the right) received Donald Tusk, President of the European Council, in London. Shoot location: London. Shoot date: 04/02/2016. (European Council – Council of the European Union Audiovisual Services).

The adult Brits are deciding today about their country’s position in or out the European Union, in a referendum that Prime Minister David Cameron was forced by his party’s ultra-Eurosceptics in January 2013 to promise to conduct it, should the Conservative Party win a majority in the 2015 legislative election. This promise was then thought it could secure a clear Tory victory and an absolute majority in the general elections of May 2015.

The absolute majority was actually achieved and Cameron won an electoral triumph, but still it’s not clear if the promise was needed. This kind of debate will surely follow whatever the outcome of today’s vote. As things stand now, the referendum will decide if Europe will continue united or Britain follows a separate way. There is more to it though.

Counting the cost

The cost of a Brexit may vary from a short run shrinking plus a long term recession of the British economy, to a global ‘Black Friday’ in the capital and money markets. Such a prospect can easily trigger a new financial black out, with the banks stopping to lend each other, until it becomes clear who is exposed to what risks. In this way, the western financial system may freeze for quite some time, with unpredictable repercussions to the real economy, an actual Armageddon, just like the 2008-2010 crash. It was like that in 2008, when Lehman Brothers went bust. Apparently, the heated discussion about who is to blame for a Brexit will encompass all the costly effects of such an unfavorable possibility.

That is why the whole world issued advice for Britain to stay in the EU, while many authoritative entities aired threats should the Britons choose ‘leave’. From the IMF, the OECD, the Bank of England, the Fed, the western banking conglomerates to the Washington, Berlin and Paris administrations, all stated how dangerous it is to try reshaping the world, after Britain chooses to sail alone in the open seas.

Reshaping the world

Unquestionably, Britain is a global player. Consequently, its repositioning in relation with the EU would have upshots spanning from a possible financial black out, to geostrategic reordering, none of which would be a smooth or peaceful process. In view of the cost of a possible Brexit, David Cameron decided to lead the ‘remain’ campaign. Quite understandably, he pondered all the dangers his country will be exposed to, if his 2013 promise turns sour. All along the past few months he fought to the best of his abilities for the ‘remain’ vote. He even went as far as to state that his government has not drafted a fully fledged contingency plan for the ‘leave’ eventuality.

George Osborn, the Chancellor of the Exchequer when asked last Monday, if he would think about stopping the transactions in the London Stock Exchange, if the market goes wild on Friday after a possible ‘leave’ vote on Thursday, he said “The Bank of England Governor Mark Carney and myself, have, of course, discussed contingency plans, but the sensible thing is to keep those secret and make sure you are well prepared for whatever happens.” He clarified though that “the government did not have a wider contingency plan for the UK beyond the immediate impact of a Leave vote” and solemnly added, “such plans can’t protect people from the shock” that would follow.

The cost of ‘leave’

In short, the London government told the Britons that there is no way to protect them from what is to follow, if they decide to ‘leave’. This was a very farfetched statement tantamount to an ultimate menace. Given that Osborn couldn’t utter such a threat without Cameron’s OK, it’s obvious that the British Prime Minister has used all the possible and even impossible means, to convince his compatriots to vote ‘stay’ and save him from the ordeal which may follow. Obviously, he dreads the ultimate consequences of his 2013 ‘promise’, which gave him an unexpected electoral victory, but may now drive his country to the rocks.

In many respects, the blame game in a possible ‘leave’ outcome, has already begun. The leader of the Labour Party, Jeremy Corbyn, has triggered it. He was never an EU ‘lover’ as he has repeatedly said, but clearly he supported the ‘remain’ side, although in a lukewarm political way. In this respect then his statement that he “wouldn’t take the blame of a possible ‘leave’ result” has de facto started this discussion.

The ‘remain’ also costs

As for the ‘remain’ probable result in today’s vote there is not much to say. Britain has got what Cameron asked for a few months ago. He negotiated that with the German Chancellor Angela Merkel and the French President Francois Hollande, when the three traded the terms for Cameron to assume the leadership of the ‘remain’ campaign. This was mainly a four years block of social benefit payments to immigrants from other EU countries, working in Britain. There would be nothing more for Britain, if the country decides to stay in the EU.

However there is more to Wolfgang Schäuble’s threat that “it’s either in or out”. He obviously meant that Britain in case of a ‘leave’ outcome won’t get a free trade agreement like Swiss or Norway. This was two weeks ago. Last Monday though, Schäuble left it to be understood that even a ‘stay’ outcome won’t be without repercussions for Britain. According to Brussels sources, Cameron’s decision to ‘promise’ in 2013 this in-out the EU referendum in order to win a general election, is not forgotten. A lot of people in Berlin, Paris, Rome and Brussels are furious about the easiness of the Brits to keep constantly ‘rethinking’ their participation in the EU.

Problems for Britain even if it ‘remains’

This British attitude is not without cost to the EU as a whole. Even a ‘remain’ outcome won’t completely cure the trauma inflicted to EU’s status by the UK challenge. So there would be problems even in the ‘remain’ event. In the future, the British demands for ‘special treatment’ will be briefly denied and London will have difficulties in the day to day business with Brussels.

Undoubtedly, there is a lot in this line, especially given the way the London financial markets and the banks work, as if the country was a real off shore state. If the Brussels bureaucracy, with only 4% Britons, decides to create problems to Britain, the sky will be the limit.

More in the British path?

On top of that, Cameron’s idea to risk the full EU membership of his country in order to just win an election may, and very probably will, open the appetite of certain political formations in Europe to do the same. That is to say, promising referendums about their country’s participation in the EU, in order to win an election. In Italy the Five Star Movement of Beppe Grillo, in France the National Front of Marine Le Pen, in Germany the AfD and other Eurosceptic extreme right, left or harlequin parties are surely getting similar ideas.

Then, it will be the end of the entire European edifice, and the national divisions will bring the Old Continent more than one hundred years back, to the era of the pre 1914 WWI period. Can the world stand it? Seemingly, Cameron didn’t think much about all that, when in January 2013 he ‘promised’ the in-out the EU referendum. A lot of elite people in Europe and elsewhere do not forget it.

As a result, not without reason, Cameron has avowed that he won’t contest a new term as Prime Minister and he will quit the leadership of his party before the next general election. His successors for the Tory leadership have started to compete. The ‘leave’ campaign helped Michael Gove, the No2 in the Tory leave camp, to challenge Boris Johnson, until recently the more probable successor of Cameron.

Finally, going back to today’s possible outcomes, a ‘remain’ result will be handled within known and well charted waters, while the ‘leave’ is to open Pandora’s Box, to say the least.

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Discovering Europe: Free EU rail pass for 18 year olds

Radioactive nuclear waste is a global threat. These scientists may have a new solution

These are the 4 most likely scenarios for the future of energy

UN agency chiefs issue ‘call to action’ on behalf of refugee children

7 simple steps we can all take to reduce food waste

State aid: Commission amends Short-term export-credit insurance Communication in light of economic impact of coronavirus outbreak

Quicker freezing and confiscation of criminal assets in the EU

UN updates guidelines to ensure successful return to civilian life for former combatants

80 adolescents a day will still die of AIDS by 2030, despite slowdown in epidemic

‘Well-being of two million’ in Gaza at stake as emergency fuel runs dry: UN humanitarian coordinator

Pedal power makes ‘positive impact on climate’, urges UN on World Bicycle Day

Can Eurozone’s uncertain growth answer the challenges that lie ahead?

Commission: Gifts of €6 billion and free trainees to ‘help’ poor employers

Tackle ‘tsunami of hatred’ across the world urges Guterres, to counter anti-Semitism, racism and intolerance

We need to rethink the way we heat ourselves. Here’s why

Deal agreed to protect consumers against misleading and unfair practices

Quality of air in Bucharest-Romania: is it fog or is it smog?

China is among the 20 most innovative economies for the first time

New General Assembly President brings ‘valuable insights’ into key UN challenges

What if big-tech companies became non-profits?

Syrian crisis: EU mobilises an overall pledge of €6.9 billion for 2020 and beyond

In this Tokyo cafe, the waiters are robots operated remotely by people with disabilities

As urbanisation grows, cities unveil sustainable development solutions on World Day

Workers want flexibility. After COVID, they just might get it: Poll

Eritrea sanctions lifted amid growing rapprochement with Ethiopia: Security Council

‘Grave consequences’ await if new deadly escalation of violence in Gaza continues – top UN official

An ageing workforce isn’t a burden. It’s an opportunity

EU budget 2019 approved: focus on the young, innovation and migration

FIFA and UN kick off healthy living campaign, to harness global game’s ‘huge potential’

EU’s unsparing question to UK: now what kind of future relations do you want?

Guatemala: UN anti-corruption body will continue working, as Constitutional Court blocks Government expulsion

Haiti stands ‘at the crossroads’ between peacekeeping, development – Bachelet urges strengthened ‘human rights protection’

A Brussels antithesis reveals where the EU is heading

EU, Brazil to hold high level Summit in Brasilia

Don’t understand the US-China trade war? This metaphor could help

Amazon: our green is turning to ashes

‘Mosques should be safe havens, not sites of terror’, says Guterres announcing UN plan to help safeguard religious sites

Find unity ‘to halt Libya’s senseless unraveling’, UN envoy urges Security Council

Despite violence, ‘tremendous hunger’ for peace in Afghanistan: top UN official

What does strategy have to do with a platform approach?

COP21 Breaking News: China has promised to cut emissions from its coal power plants by 60% by 2020

How civil society must adapt to survive its greatest challenges

‘Historic’ moment: Palestine takes reins of UN coalition of developing countries

This new form of currency could transform the way we see money

GDPR and the World Cup have these 4 things in common

A ‘strong and united Europe’ has never been more needed, declares UN chief Guterres

South Sudan: UN calls for end to inter-communal clashes, attacks against aid workers

WEF Davos 2016 LIVE: “If we do not do properly the Paris agreement, then all 16 remaining goals will be undermined”, UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon cautions from Davos

The importance and the need of mobile technology in the health care system and in saving lives.

European Public Prosecutor’s Office: EU Prosecutors take their oath at the European Court of Justice

The United Kingdom’s decision to leave the European Union will impact young people’s future the most

European Union signs aviation agreement with the Republic of Korea

Marriage equality boosted employment of both partners in US gay and lesbian couples

India and the US: 5 ways the countries compare

Unlock the value proposition for Connected Insurance

Trade in counterfeit goods costs UK economy billions of euros

Sochi not far away from Ukraine

ECB: Monetary policy decisions

What the future holds for the EU – China relations?

US-North Korea summit ‘an important milestone’ towards denuclearization, says Guterres

More Stings?

Advertising

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s