What have the banks done to the markets making them unable to bear cheap oil?

Members of the European Parliament make a visit to the stock exchange in Shanghai, China. ( ©European Union EP/PE ).

Members of the European Parliament make a visit to the stock exchange in Shanghai, China. ( ©European Union EP/PE ).

Last Tuesday, a new steep fall of the price of crude oil by almost 5%, triggered another selloff in all the major capital markets of the world. The New York and the European stock exchanges lost anything between 2% and 3% of their capitalization. One may observe that this development is one of many of the kind we have witnessed just after the first day of 2016. However, this latest development demonstrated a very clear connection between the price of oil and the general indexes of all key stock exchanges. Undoubtedly, it was a really new and exemplarily solid correlation.

It’s a bit awkward though that the world stock markets – and together with them the prospects of the global economy – are so straightforwardly following the fall of the prices of oil. And this despite the fact that most of the big developed and developing countries are great oil consumers. A first year student of economics would logically expect them to increase growth gear on so much cheaper oil.

Biased economic analysts?

On the contrary, many mainstream economic analysts support a just coined theory, that cheap oil is not a very good base for faster growth for the real economy of our energy thirsty world. They argue that the global economy doesn’t necessarily profit from cheaper oil. There may be some truth in this claim, because oil producers are now having a hard time and consequently are extensively cutting down their purchases from the rest of the world. In this line of thinking, the prospects for the world economy are worse at times of very cheap oil, and that’s why stock markets keep falling.

Nevertheless, this is the first time in the history of economic theories that Russia, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Venezuela and Kuwait are thought to be setting the tempo for the global economy. They may be very important players in the international oil arena, but they have never set the path for the developing economies and of course not for the developed ones.

How much growth is enough?

In any case, the world economy is not doing that bad. According to IMF’s World Economic Outlook of last January, global growth is expected to increase this year and reach 3.4% after a modest 3.1% in 2015. For 2017 is predicted to reach 3.7%, not at all a bad prospect. The same source refers to the “exit from extraordinarily accommodative monetary conditions in the United States” as one of the major “Risks to the global outlook… relate to ongoing adjustments in the global economy”.

In plain English, this means that the difficult part for the world economy is the adjustment of the giant banks, in the new environment of gradual exit from the super generous ‘money for nothing’ policy, the American central bank, the Fed has followed since 2008 and up to December 2015. Mind you, that there is an ongoing quasi blackmail of the ‘markets’ aka banks towards the Fed, to water down its plan to exit from the ‘money for nothing’ policy.

They do need more than $4.5 trillion

Of course, the Fed’s $4.5 free trillions have been handed out only to the largest world banks and now it seems difficult for them to learn living without it or with less and a bit more expensive of it. It seems, though, that this is not the only problem for banks and their relationship with the oil markets needs more attention.

A suspicious observer has to look for more hidden corners in the currently very delicate and complex situation in the global financial scenery. And this hidden corner is the newly emerging tight correlation of the price of crude oil with the major stock market indexes. The conclusion then comes freely; stock markets led by banks seem very exposed to oil prices. In short, the banks have now one more challenge to face. Apart from being completely dependent on the Fed’s super accommodative monetary policy which has to change now, they also have to cope with their now emerging new exposure to the oil market. Let’s see what has happened.

What if some oil bubbles bust?

Apparently the banks have used the Fed liquidity and to a smaller extent the money from other monetary authorities to place massive bets in the derivative markets related to oil and other commodities. In short, the banks have used the free trillions from the monetary authorities to profit from those underlying real markets but at the same time having created unbelievably dangerous bubbles.

As a result, the vertical fall of the price of oil has caused substantial losses for the banks and consequently has hurt the stock markets. In reality, the global real economy has no problem whatsoever with the falling oil prices as it has always been the case, at the newfound exception though of the ‘too big to fail’ banks.

The banks will get more money

As a matter of fact, the vast size of the banks and the immense volume of the out of control grey derivative markets now threaten once more the real economy with another financial Armageddon. However, the monetary authorities armed with the experience of the 2008-2010 crisis are aware of this new menace. That’s why the other major central banks in Europe, China, Japan and elsewhere appear ready to fill the gap that the Fed plans to leave in the ‘money for nothin’ game.

The ECB is ready next month to expand its extraordinary monetary easing measures beyond the limit recently set at €1.8tn to 2tn. Even more so, because the Eurozone lenders seem to be more exposed to risks than their American counterparts. Deutsche Bank is a disappointing example of that. That’s why Germany will very probably not block Mario Draghi’s new quantitative easing initiative.

Alas, it’s pretty clear that the world real economy is once more threatened by the ‘too big to fail’ financial conglomerates.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

Who is responsible for public health? The tendencies and its benefits –or not– on Health Education around the world

Britain and Germany change attitude towards the European Union

The untold story of who caused and who pays for the economic crisis

Minority governments ‘à la mode’ in Europe but can they last long?

“Who do I call if I want to call Europe?” Finally a name and a number to answer Henry Kissinger’s question

EU Parliament raises burning issues over the FTA with the US

Fair completion rules and the law of gravity don’t apply to banks

Deutsche Bank: the next financial crisis is here and the lenders need €150 billion from taxpayers

The European Commission to stop Buffering

MEPs and European Youth Forum call on EU to Invest in Youth

Will ECB win against low inflation by not following Quantitave Easing?

EU responds to terror fallout by eroding borderless Europe and molesting the refugees

EU Parliament and Council: Close to agreement on the bank resolution mechanism

EU finally agrees on target for 40% greenhouse emission cuts ahead of Paris climate talks

Making money from meeting the SDGs? An overarching approach to sustainable development.

EU’s Mogherini visits Turkey “to step up engagement” and highlight interests

Diana in Vietnam

MWC 2016 LIVE: Xiaomi looks to revive growth with flagships

Italy can stand the US rating agencies’ meaningless degrading

“China is the only BRICS country to have either met or possibly slightly surpassed my expectations”, BRICS inventor Jim O’ Neil from Switzerland; the Sting reports live from World Economic Forum 2015 in Davos

Resisting EU budget cuts

EU Trust Fund for Africa: Can it be beneficial for Italy and tackle the migration crisis in the Mediterranean?

The Brits are not an exception and that’s why they voted to leave

Is the European Banking Union an impossible task?

Trump to run America to the tune of his business affairs

Council’s position on Visa Directive a step back for young people’s mobility

Civil society organisations disenchanted with “Youth Guarantee”

The financial sector cripples Eurozone growth prospects

Zhua Zhou: Choosing The Future

Is Eurozone preparing to abandon austerity and stagnation?

EU Parliament semi worried over democratic deficit

Banks cannot die but can be fined

Competing with Apple and leading innovation: Google’s world replies to EU on android charges

Does the EU want GMOs and meat with hormones from the US?

EU security and defence industry prepares positions for ‘producers’ and ‘customers’

EU Council: Private web data to be protected by…abusers

My unlimited China

Towards a seamless internal EU market for industrial goods

Is it impossible to place the banks under control?

Who cares more about taxpayers? The US by being harsh on major banks or the EU still caressing them?

Schaeuble wants IMF out and bailouts ‘a la carte’ with Germany only to gain

The strong version of the EU banking union gains momentum

Economic sentiment and business climate stagnate in miserable euro area

Who and why want the EU-US trade agreement here and now

Draghi reserved about Eurozone’s growth prospects

“At the Environment Assembly citizens expect clean, not hot air”, the Head of UN Environment in Europe underscores in a Sting Exclusive

Q&A on the 19th China-EU Summit to be held on 01-02 June 2017 in Brussels

Doctors vs. Industry 4.0: who will win?

EU’s unsparing question to UK: now what kind of future relations do you want?

A Sting Exclusive: “Europe must be more ambitious in COP21 and lead on climate finance and sustainable development”, Green UK MEP Jean Lambert points out from Brussels

The consequences of Brexit seen by a European young entrepreneur

EU readies for eventual annulment of the Turkish agreement on immigrants-refugees

Learn from the margin, not the center: digital innovation with social impact as transformative force bridging digital divide

Tiny Iceland teaches the West how to treat bankers

What is the IMF telling Eurozone about fiscal and banking unification?

A long German political winter is on the way

Youth and children in Europe set the new perspectives for the decades to come

EU-US to miss 2015 deadline and even lose Germany’s support in TTIP’s darkest week yet

Preparing for developing countries the ‘Greek cure’

In dreams and in love there are no impossibilities

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s