I’m not feeling lucky: The “Right to Be Forgotten” ruling puts Google inside a box

Google Logo

“How should one person’s right to be forgotten be balanced with the public’s right to know?”
This is the question that Google is asking to its users with an open form which allows the general public to offer its advice. This happens in a moment that the first effects of the decision of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) two months ago, which gives people the right to ask search engines like Google to remove results for queries that include their name, are becoming visible.

Now the Mountain View, California-based giant, struggles with handling the ECJ’s diktat and the sea of requests received every day. And through this question the world’s biggest search-engine company demonstrates that it is not only good at giving answers, but also at asking questions. Because basically it’s not possible to give an answer here. Or, well, I am not able at least.

One step back. Last May, the European Court of Justice has backed the “right to be forgotten” and told Google to delete “inadequate, irrelevant or no longer relevant” data from its results when a member of the public openly requests it. The issue started when a Spanish man, Mario Costeja González, brought a privacy case to the ECJ after he failed to secure the deletion of an auction notice of his repossessed home, which was still visible at the time on the website of a newspaper in Catalonia, since 1998.

An interesting case, for sure, and also a good chance to try to put ourselves in this gentleman’s shoes, in a situation that he described as a fight “for the elimination of data that adversely affects people’s honour, dignity and exposes their private lives”. Google spokesmen openly demonstrated their disappointment for the decision at first, saying that would have been required “to take time to analyse the implications.” After that, Google’s key people frequently declared that they were doing “their best” to try to accomodate the ECJ’s directions.

And here we are. After two months, Google now seems to be on the spotlight with this complicated matter. Google says it has received more than 70,000 takedown requests since May, covering 250,000 webpages, something that was depicted by Google itself as “a huge task”.This huge task recently seemed to be even bigger, when earlier this month Google removed the links to several journalistic articles from the Guardian, the Daily Mail, the BBC and other British news outlet and then made a U-turn.

After having received notice from Google that some of their content was being removed from search results on some European versions of the search engine, those British media have been informed that the links have been finally reinstated. So Google has basically acknowledged that it “incorrectly” removed links to those articles, and is now looking for new solutions to follow the ECJ’s rules. One of these new “solutions” is for instance the form that invites Google users to submit their thoughts and feedback on the ECJ’s mandate for the Right To Be Forgotten. The Mountain View giant has also informed that a board of experts was set up in order to gather contributions on the matter.

This is the result of the massive confusion contained in the European Court’s ruling, in my opinion. The ECJ has indeed found that people have the right to ask for information to be removed from search results that include their names if it is “inadequate, irrelevant or no longer relevant, or excessive”, as said. Well, isn’t this incredibly vague and subjective? That’s why I truly believe it’s basically not possible to give an adequate answer to Google’s question.

On top of that keep in mind that, while deciding what to remove, search engines must also have a “regard to the public interest”, as requested by the Court of Justice. Now, it’s undeniable that the ECJ has -although indirectly- established that a search engine like Google must be regarded as a sort of “data controller” with the right to decide whether something is or is not of public interest. And please note that this is allowed in a territory, excuse me, in a market, where Google sells advertising spaces, where Google promotes its activities, where Google makes money. Many data protection lawyers said the ruling takes Google far from a formal “neutral intermediary” status. And that’s why I ask: is this what we really want? Is this ruling, as it is right now, what we really need? In my opinion there’s a lot to do in order to make this act way more equal and useful in terms of public interest.

Among those who think that there’s still a lot to do and to talk about there’s one of the experts of the Google’s council. His name is David Drummond and he also serves as senior Vice President, corporate development and chief legal officer for Google. Mr. Drummond has recently become a bit more famous after he has written a column for the Guardian, in which he openly declares his disagreement with the ruling. In the article he also adds that the ruling negatively restricts the public’s ability to exercise free expression in the continent-state.

And this is exactly where I want to start to give a conclusion to my already-long article. As I said in the beginning, I don’t really know how to reply to Google’s question. I can only say that it’s not possible at the moment, where a good balance between privacy protection and freedom of expression does not exist. All I know is that when there’s the risk of some kind of censorship under discussion, we all should be very careful. And that in a Union where the freedom of expression is one of the main pillars, a perfect balance between the people’s right to privacy and the people’s right to know must be guaranteed.











the European Sting Milestones

Featured Stings

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

More electric cars on EU roads by 2030

How we can win the war against antibiotic resistance

5 amazing people fighting to save the oceans

United States: UN human rights office welcomes California moratorium on death penalty

‘We will not give up on looking for peace for South Sudan’: UN deputy chief

International Day of the Midwife: 5 things you should know

Tackling terrorism: MEPs approve tighter rules on homemade explosives

EU to pay a dear price if the next crisis catches Eurozone stagnant and deflationary; dire statistics from Eurostat

Trump and Brexit: After the social whys the political whereto

The banks want now free capital from taxpayers

The Energy Union: from vision to reality

France, Germany challenge Trump’s America on Iran and the reign of the dollar

Youth not prioritised in new Commission

The global suicide rate is growing – what can we do?

Gig economy: Employment Committee MEPs want to boost workers’ rights

China will be the world’s top tourist destination by 2030

‘Stop and listen’ to victims of terrorism, UN chief urges in message marking international day

Norway has successfully enforced its foreign bribery laws but faces potential obstacles

EU-UK: A deal synonymous to ‘remain’, England pays the Irish price

RescEU: MEPs vote to upgrade EU civil protection capacity

Commission’s action plan: financial world mandatory links to environmental targets

Easing funding woes for UN agency assisting Palestine refugees a ‘wise investment for today and the future’

Economic growth ‘exceeds expectations’ but trade tensions are rising: UN report

European Parliament calls on Russia to end occupation of Georgian territories

UN chief expresses solidarity with Indonesian authorities after flash floods kill dozens in Papua

Falling inflation urges ECB to introduce growth measures today

‘Virginity testing’: a human rights violation, with no scientific basis – UN

Fisherwomen of Lake Chad show optimism in face of multiple challenges

“Access denied”: the Greek health system under pressure

Former Chilean President Bachelet put forward by UN chief as next High Commissioner for Human Rights

ECB reaches the boundaries of its mandate to revive the entirety of Eurozone

UN official sees ‘unprecedented opportunities’ to make progress on peace in Afghanistan

Scale of displacement across Myanmar ‘very difficult to gauge’, says UN refugee agency

What we need for a better European Solidarity Corps

UN monitoring team in Yemen verifies pullout of armed forces from crucial port zones

EU: Huge surplus in the trade of services with the rest of the world

Populist Eurosceptics helped by Trumpists seriously threaten the EU edifice

A conceptual approach to Violence Against Healthcare in Turkey from SDG’s

Yemen parties underscore ‘strong desire’ for peace, UN Envoy reports

Joint EU-U.S. statement following the EU-U.S. Justice and Home Affairs Ministerial Meeting

Back to the Basics: Primary Healthcare

The West unites against Mali desert rebels

Easing fears and promoting gender equality in Chad’s girls-only classrooms

Parliament boosts consumer rights online and offline

Aid teams respond to escalating southwest Syria conflict: 750,000 civilians are at risk

Who may profit from the rise of the extreme right in the West?

France: New labour laws for more competitiveness

10 ways central banks are experimenting with blockchain

Merkel had it her way with the refugees & immigrants but can Greece and Turkey deliver?

Minsk “ceasefire” leaves more doubts than safety, with EU already planning steps further

Health & Sustainable Development Goals: it’s about doing what we can

Scotland wants to create an ethical stock exchange (Post Brexit)

Multilateralism’s ‘proven record of service’ is focus of first-ever International Day

European Business Summit 2013: Where Business and Politics shape the future

Afghanistan: UN mission condemns deadly attack near Kabul airport

How oysters are cleaning New York’s polluted harbor

Defence: European Commission paves the way for first joint industrial projects under EU budget

Large parts of the world are growing more fragile. Here are 5 steps to reverse course

6 charts that show how Japan’s economy stacks up as it enters a new era

UN emergency relief fund has ‘never been more critical’: Guterres

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s