I’m not feeling lucky: The “Right to Be Forgotten” ruling puts Google inside a box

Google Logo

“How should one person’s right to be forgotten be balanced with the public’s right to know?”
This is the question that Google is asking to its users with an open form which allows the general public to offer its advice. This happens in a moment that the first effects of the decision of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) two months ago, which gives people the right to ask search engines like Google to remove results for queries that include their name, are becoming visible.

Now the Mountain View, California-based giant, struggles with handling the ECJ’s diktat and the sea of requests received every day. And through this question the world’s biggest search-engine company demonstrates that it is not only good at giving answers, but also at asking questions. Because basically it’s not possible to give an answer here. Or, well, I am not able at least.

One step back. Last May, the European Court of Justice has backed the “right to be forgotten” and told Google to delete “inadequate, irrelevant or no longer relevant” data from its results when a member of the public openly requests it. The issue started when a Spanish man, Mario Costeja González, brought a privacy case to the ECJ after he failed to secure the deletion of an auction notice of his repossessed home, which was still visible at the time on the website of a newspaper in Catalonia, since 1998.

An interesting case, for sure, and also a good chance to try to put ourselves in this gentleman’s shoes, in a situation that he described as a fight “for the elimination of data that adversely affects people’s honour, dignity and exposes their private lives”. Google spokesmen openly demonstrated their disappointment for the decision at first, saying that would have been required “to take time to analyse the implications.” After that, Google’s key people frequently declared that they were doing “their best” to try to accomodate the ECJ’s directions.

And here we are. After two months, Google now seems to be on the spotlight with this complicated matter. Google says it has received more than 70,000 takedown requests since May, covering 250,000 webpages, something that was depicted by Google itself as “a huge task”.This huge task recently seemed to be even bigger, when earlier this month Google removed the links to several journalistic articles from the Guardian, the Daily Mail, the BBC and other British news outlet and then made a U-turn.

After having received notice from Google that some of their content was being removed from search results on some European versions of the search engine, those British media have been informed that the links have been finally reinstated. So Google has basically acknowledged that it “incorrectly” removed links to those articles, and is now looking for new solutions to follow the ECJ’s rules. One of these new “solutions” is for instance the form that invites Google users to submit their thoughts and feedback on the ECJ’s mandate for the Right To Be Forgotten. The Mountain View giant has also informed that a board of experts was set up in order to gather contributions on the matter.

This is the result of the massive confusion contained in the European Court’s ruling, in my opinion. The ECJ has indeed found that people have the right to ask for information to be removed from search results that include their names if it is “inadequate, irrelevant or no longer relevant, or excessive”, as said. Well, isn’t this incredibly vague and subjective? That’s why I truly believe it’s basically not possible to give an adequate answer to Google’s question.

On top of that keep in mind that, while deciding what to remove, search engines must also have a “regard to the public interest”, as requested by the Court of Justice. Now, it’s undeniable that the ECJ has -although indirectly- established that a search engine like Google must be regarded as a sort of “data controller” with the right to decide whether something is or is not of public interest. And please note that this is allowed in a territory, excuse me, in a market, where Google sells advertising spaces, where Google promotes its activities, where Google makes money. Many data protection lawyers said the ruling takes Google far from a formal “neutral intermediary” status. And that’s why I ask: is this what we really want? Is this ruling, as it is right now, what we really need? In my opinion there’s a lot to do in order to make this act way more equal and useful in terms of public interest.

Among those who think that there’s still a lot to do and to talk about there’s one of the experts of the Google’s council. His name is David Drummond and he also serves as senior Vice President, corporate development and chief legal officer for Google. Mr. Drummond has recently become a bit more famous after he has written a column for the Guardian, in which he openly declares his disagreement with the ruling. In the article he also adds that the ruling negatively restricts the public’s ability to exercise free expression in the continent-state.

And this is exactly where I want to start to give a conclusion to my already-long article. As I said in the beginning, I don’t really know how to reply to Google’s question. I can only say that it’s not possible at the moment, where a good balance between privacy protection and freedom of expression does not exist. All I know is that when there’s the risk of some kind of censorship under discussion, we all should be very careful. And that in a Union where the freedom of expression is one of the main pillars, a perfect balance between the people’s right to privacy and the people’s right to know must be guaranteed.

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

EU adopts rebalancing measures in reaction to US steel and aluminium tariffs

Italy’s M.Renzi and Germany’s S. Gabriel veto austerity, ask EU leaders to endorse growth measures

Christmas spending: Who can afford not to cut?

Direction Wakanda: finance methods to make Africa a superhero continent

Women’s empowerment ‘essential to global progress’ says Guterres, marking International Day

How farms are getting closer to consumers in the pandemic

Central African Republic militia leader and football executive, transferred to ICC

OECD and European Commission join forces to further support structural reforms in European countries

What’s the difference between carbon negative and carbon neutral?

‘Crimes against humanity,’ ‘war crimes’ and risk of new ethnic violence in DR Congo, warn UN experts

This chart shows the fall in coal-power plants being planned around the world

Scotland and First Minister Salmond enter the most challenging battlefield for independence: Europe

Sustainable development demands a broader vision, says new OECD Development Centre report

COP24: World sports join team UN in race against climate change

Brussels terrorist attacks: Schengen in danger once again while leaders gather Europe’s multiple broken pieces

When is Berlin telling the truth about the EU banking union?

The European Parliament wants to stay in one place

New research reveals the true extent of corruption in fisheries

Trump ostracized by his party and world elites but still remains in course; how can he do it?

This chart shows the total number of COVID-19 cases and recoveries so far

The world needs carbon-neutral flying. Here’s how to bring it one step closer

Soccer is back with strict COVID-19 rules. Here’s what you need to know

This Dutch company has devised an innovative way to deal with food waste

Parental leave: why we can’t wait a century for equal rights for women

Countries must invest at least 1% more of GDP on primary healthcare to eliminate glaring coverage gaps

This man ran across the USA to raise awareness of plastic pollution

Business leaders must now turn positive ESG talk into long-term results

Rule of Law: European Commission takes new step to protect judges in Poland against political control

Parliament adopts its position on digital copyright rules

These countries have some of the highest voter turnout in the world

Thursday’s Daily Brief: Safeguarding civilians, strengthening Ebola response in DR Congo, marking Fistula Day, updates on CAR and Syria

The US calls off globalization, targets Germany. Paris offer to Berlin comes at a cost

Humanitarian aid: €7 million for disaster preparedness in Southern Africa and Indian Ocean region

How to create responsible supply chains in the age of globalization 4.0

Scale of displacement across Myanmar ‘very difficult to gauge’, says UN refugee agency

Gaza probe finds ‘reasonable grounds’ Israeli forces committed international human rights violations

Free flow of non-personal data: Parliament approves EU’s fifth freedom

The fatal consequences of troika’s blind austerity policy

Increased levels of carbon dioxide could reduce brainpower, study finds

A day in the life of a refugee: the wait

Coronavirus response: Team Europe supports Somalia with three EU Humanitarian Air Bridge flights

A Sting Exclusive: “Cybersecurity Act for a cyber-bulletproof EU”, by EU Vice-President Ansip

COVID-19: MEPs fear impact on justice system and threat to rule of law

It will take a lot more than free menstrual pads to end period poverty

IMF’s Lagarde: Ukraine must fight corruption

Top UN political official updates Security Council on Iran nuclear deal

COVID-19 is likely to increase youth unemployment in Africa, this is how business can mitigate the damage

Bacterial resistance: the significant worldwide problem

4 views on the shape of global cooperation in the time of COVID-19

Negative inflation hits Eurozone, ECB to print and distribute one trillion euro earlier than expected

These countries are leading the way in green finance

Young migrants: Is Europe creating a lost generation?

These chefs are fighting hunger and poverty with gastronomy

Tropical Cyclone Idai affects 1.5 million across Mozambique and Malawi, as UN ramps up response

A Sting Exclusive: Disaster risk resilience, key to protecting vulnerable communities

How COVID-19 shows the urgent need to address the cyber poverty gap

Europe and UN form bulwark against ‘might makes right’ worldview, EU foreign affairs chief tells Security Council

Safety fits into our palms: The role of mobile technology in healthcare systems and life saving

Aluminium can help to build the circular economy. Here’s how

Will COVID-19 usher in a new culture of outdoor living and dining?

More Stings?

Advertising

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s