EDRi @ European Business Summit 2014: Digital Citizenship in Brussels – the case of Net Neutrality

Participation of Neelie Kroes, Vice-President of the EC, at the seminar "Women on top", organised in Amsterdam (EC Audiovisual Library)

Participation of Neelie Kroes, Vice-President of the EC, at the seminar “Women on top”, organised in Amsterdam (EC Audiovisual Library)

Written by Joe McNamee, Executive Director of European Digital Rights (EDRi)

Net neutrality is a digital rights issue, par excellence. The internet has created huge opportunities for the exercise of freedom of communication, for freedom of assembly and for democracy. These opportunities have the same roots as the huge economic success of the internet: openness. The internet allows anyone to connect to anyone without discrimination. Ideas – political, social or business – become global phenomena at a speed that would be unthinkable without this openness.

This openness has been preserved in a telecommunications market that exists because of regulation. Starting from the old national telecoms monopolies 25 years ago, the EU prised the markets open with a series of major liberalisation packages, supplemented with targeted interventions (such as on roaming and local loop unbundling) whenever it became clear (or, to be more precise, about two years after it became clear) that the natural anti-competitive tendency of network industries started kicking in.

In this context, it is somewhat funny, although you do have to admire their cheek, to listen to representatives of former monopolies furrow their collective brows and talk in hushed tones about the “dangers of over-regulation” and the “risks to investment” in infrastructure if net neutrality is protected by law. These protestations are even more amusing when we consider that the telecoms industry lobbied against pretty much every pro-competitive measure, ostensibly due to fears about network investment – fears that subsequently proved unfounded. This is an industry that is as successful as it is because political leaders largely ignored this nonsense and pushed competition into a market that gravitates towards anti-competitive behaviour.

As an alternative to this “over-regulation” that they claim to fear, the former monopolies propose a complete re-invention of how traffic flows over the internet. They have suggested a “sending party pays” model – where they can charge any online service for “sending” traffic to their customers – even though, it is quite obvious that their customers actively choose (and pay to choose) to download content rather than it being passively sent to them. In other words, they suggest creating a new monopoly, where access to their customers becomes the product. Instead of an open internet, we would have a closed, unpredictable “internet”. Individuals would pay to connect to the internet and “the internet” would pay to connect to them!

The telecoms operators explain that competition would act as a safeguard, because customers can change from one operator to another if they are not getting access to the right services. And, if you have never tried to change from one access provider to another, you might be inclined to believe this. However, what about if you are trying to get investment for an innovative new EU-wide online service in this new market? You have to explain to the bank that, at any given moment, you could lose access to half of the market to any given country, unless you pay the dominant telecoms operator whatever ransom they decide to charge to permit access to its customer base. The damage to innovation would be disastrous.

Ultimately, less innovation will lead to less compelling online content and services, leading to less demand for high-quality services, to the detriment of the entire online economy, and to the detriment of the telecoms companies. However, the destruction of net neutrality would come at an even greater cost – namely free speech. The internet has flourished because the EU, following the example of the USA, has established provisions to make sure that, within strict limits, internet companies cannot be held iable for illegal content to which they unknowingly provide access to. In EU jargon, they cannot be held liable if they are acting as a “mere conduit” to the content in question.

If the telecoms providers are deciding what their customers can gain access to – particularly if using surveillance methods such as “deep packet inspection” – they will no longer be able to claim that they are “mere conduits”. This will inevitably lead to policy-makers demanding that they should be more liable for what is accessed by their customers. It will also lead to more court injunctions that will seek to use the expanded technical capacities of telecoms companies to identify and block traffic on their networks. Already this year, we have seen the European Court of Justice rule that crude, non-specific injunctions can be imposed on telecoms companies to “take reasonable measures” (“reasonable” will change in meaning as technical capacities develop) to prevent access to specific content or websites.

So, instead of “over-regulation”, the telecoms companies campaign in favour of a restructuring of the internet. They campaign for a restructuring that would destroy the vibrant nature of online service provision, to the detriment of citizens and business, including the telecoms companies. They campaign for a restructuring in the knowledge that this will come at the cost of a significant increase in legal liability, leading to an increase in surveillance, blocking and filtering. Still, that’s better than over- regulation, apparently.

EDRi believes that the openness of the internet is what has generated the amazing tools that citizens now have at their fingertips to communicate, to campaign and to organise. We believe that the environment that generated this innovation must be maintained. We believe that the legal protections of the businesses that facilitate the exercise of our online freedoms must be preserved.

European Digital Rights (EDRi) is an association of 36 digital rights organisations from 21 countries. We campaign to defend citizens’ rights in the online environment.

Joe McNamee is Executive Director of European Digital Rights, where he has worked since 2009. He holds Master’s Degrees in European Politics (Wales) and International Law (Kent). His first job in the internet sector was as a senior technical support adviser for an internet access provider in 1995. Prior to joining EDRi, he worked in a telecoms consultancy where he ran three independent research projects for the European Commission – on local loop unbundling, telecoms/internet convergence and information society markets in eight former Soviet states. 

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

Marco Polo’s Dream

The third bailout agreement for Greece is a done deal amid European economies full of problems

The untold story of who caused and who pays for the economic crisis

Digital business is Europe’s best hope to get back to growth

To my Chinese friend

Glaringly false reassurances about the repercussions of the EU-US free trade agreement

The DNA of the future retail CEO

EU rewards organisations that make eco-innovation pay

EU’s core members are eyeing larger parts of arms trade and of world map

European Youth Forum welcomes the European Commission’s proposed revision of the Union Code on Visas, however it does not go far enough

Eurozone: Inflation plunge to 0.4% in July may trigger cataclysmic developments

Youth not prioritised in new Commission

MWC 2016 LIVE: BlackBerry acquires Encription, talks Microsoft and health

Eurogroup asked to reduce public debts of its member states

Germany’s fiscal and financial self-destructive policies

Youth unemployment: think out of the box

Greek citizens to pay the price again but Tsipras risks losing next elections

Eurozone’s north-south growth gap to become structural

Rehn ready to sacrifice part of the real economy

Desires for national independence in Europe bound by economic realities

Starbucks and FIAT again under Commission’s microscope: is Europe ready to kick multinationals out of the house?

No way out for Eurozone’s stagnating economy

Alexis Tsipras against internal and external “enemies” in pursue of a two-phase deal now

Commission criticised member states on blocking financial transaction tax

European car industry: The Germans want it all

French Prime Minister passes Stability Program and takes his ‘café’ in Brussels this June

My unlimited China

EU Youth Conference concludes in Luxembourg with concrete plans on how to create real youth participation

Why the ECB had to clarify it caters for the entire Eurozone not just Germany?

EU prepares a banking union amidst financial ruins

Europe enters uncharted waters with Kiev-Moscow standoff

Why the financial scandals multiply?

A Sting Exclusive: China’s Foreign Minister Wang Yi on South China Sea issue at the ASEAN Regional Forum

The next EU President will first have to drink his tea at Downing Street

Why the merchant ships can pollute the atmosphere with CO2 quite freely

Another doomed EU attempt to interfere in Libya?

The US banks drive the developing world to a catastrophe

China invites the EU to a joint endeavor for free trade and order in the world

Can the national and age groups pockets of unemployment cause irreparable damages to Eurozone?

COP21 Breaking News_03 December: Europe’s children urge leaders to commit to climate action at UN Climate Summit in Paris

On Youth Participation: Are we active citizens?

Hundreds of thousands migrants ready to cross the Mediterranean. Only a local matter?

“They are trying to make improvements, but of course they are quite slow for my generation”, Vice President of JADE Victor Soto on another Sting Exclusive

A Sting Exclusive: “Without climate, forget about peace!”, Swedish MEP Bodil Valero cautions from Brussels

An EU Summit without purpose

No end to Deutsche Bank’s problems: new litigations in the US and frailty in EU stress test

EU Parliament: No EU-US trade agreement without safe data

World Retail Congress Dubai 2016: Retail’s night of nights

Can the banking union help Eurozone counter its imminent threats?

2014 budget: The EU may prove unable to agree on own resources

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s