Lagarde: Keep feeding the banks cut down wages and food subsidies

International Monetary Fund Managing Director Christine Lagarde speaks at George Washington University in Washington, DC October 3, 2013. (IMF Staff Photograph/Stephen Jaffe).

International Monetary Fund Managing Director Christine Lagarde speaks at George Washington University in Washington, DC October 3, 2013. (IMF Staff Photograph/Stephen Jaffe).

Lagarde to the world: Keep feeding the banks with zero interest rate cost money, further trim down workers’ rights in the developed world and reduce subsidies on foodstuffs and utilities in developing countries. This was in short what the managing director of IMF had to say, ahead of the 2013 World Bank-IMF Annual Meetings, when she spoke at George Washington University last week. Christine Lagarde delivered a speech entitled “New Global Transitions Need New Global Agenda”, meant to advise the globe of how to be saved from a new crisis. Instead of offering a new real growth strategy which could pay better dividends to those who sweat in industry and services, she stuck with the good old recipes of forgiving the banks for their sins and cutting down take home pay for workers. Let’s take one thing at a time.

IMF boss said she had ready-made policies for growth, one for the real economy and a second for the financial sector. In reality what she had to propose on both accounts was a ‘save the banks at all costs’ policy in US and Eurozone, while her advice to the developing countries was more like a wish rather than a policy line. “The immediate priority for emerging markets is to ride out the turbulence as smoothly as possible”, was her policy proposal, but indirectly she asked for less take home pay even for East Asia’s breadwinners.

Starting from the banks

Starting from the financial sector, Lagarde was happy to see that policy makers in the western financial universe have come up with the systemic banks lists. What else could be the meaning of her comment, that “identifying systemically-important financial institutions” was an attainment? If this was not enough to single out the banks as the prophets in our modern world, she joined the New York banking community, or rather gangs, in demanding that “Any pending normalization of monetary policy in the United States needs to be managed carefully”. In short she told the US monetary authorities, to keep feeding the American banks with trillions of freshly printed dollars at zero interest rate cost, because the world needs it.

Confirming that she added “the U.S. has a special responsibility (to the rest of the world) to implement it (the normalization of monetary policy) in an orderly way”. As if the industrious populations of the world have gained anything out of this unseen before taxpayers’ generosity towards the banks. Anticipating the criticism that she is interested only for the lenders, Lagarede also noted “to implement it in an orderly way, linking it to the pace of recovery and employment”. But it’s the same story on both sides of the North Atlantic Ocean. The ‘systemic’ banks get the free trillions from central banks and instead of according loans to the labouring segment of the society, they invest it in Turkish bonds to mention the least risky bet, where the banks ‘invest’ other peoples’ money.

Outsized ruins?

However the head of IMF couldn’t ignore the reality everybody sees today, when the banks keep usurping large parts of world’s wealth, using even illegal methods. She said that the banks “took on outsized risk in pursuit of outsized rewards, causing outsized ruin.” Yet she conveniently conceded that building something new out of that outsized banking sector is not easy and blah…blah. She finally urged for a “faster progress on outstanding areas, including derivatives and shadow banking”.

As if she doesn’t know that nothing has changed nor is planned to change, in those markets that the banks have created to cheat and unduly exploit everybody else. EU competition Commissioner’s threat against the 13 largest banks of the world remains just a sheet of paper. Joaquín Almunia, accused those financial giants of having formed a trust in the huge derivative market. As for shadow banking, only God knows what is going on there. In short all Lagarde had to say about the western financial universe was to let the banks continue their unholy game.

Passing to the real economy, despite the title of her speech, promising “New Global Agenda” in reality all she had to propose was the good old recipe for workers to ‘labour more and gain less’. Her analysis for the developing countries goes like this, “The ultimate goal of their transition is clear—living standards that are closer to the advanced economies. They can get there, but they face new obstacles in their way… A lot of this reflects the turn of the economic cycle, but part of it reflects deep-rooted structural impediments too”.

Nothing more for producers

Knowing what the IMF means when it comes to structural impediments, it becomes clear that Lagarde proposes more relaxed administrative rules, smaller state business sector and lower subsidies on foodstuffs and energy in countries like India, Russia, Brazil and others. All these policy measures mean more unemployment and more expensive necessities, mainly foodstuffs, for hundreds of millions of people. At the exception of China, Lagarde proposes also devaluation of national moneys (Currencies should be allowed to depreciate), without explaining that such a measure will mean less real incomes for the most deprived parts of the population.

The same recipe is offered for the advanced economies as well, a little reshaped though. Lagarde stressed, “For the Euro Area, the IMF estimates that comprehensive and coordinated reforms of product and labour markets could boost GDP by 3¾ % after five years”. The medicine is the basically same: more relaxed legislation in everything, less consumer and labour protection. All that, for the banks to be able to usurp the additional incomes produced by poorer workers in less protected markets.

In conclusion what the IMF and Lagarde have to propose to the world is to safeguard the western banks, deprive workers of whatever protection is left in the developed world and reduce the subsidies of necessities in developing countries.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Featured Stings

Who is responsible for public health? The tendencies and its benefits –or not– on Health Education around the world

Britain and Germany change attitude towards the European Union

The untold story of who caused and who pays for the economic crisis

Minority governments ‘à la mode’ in Europe but can they last long?

“Who do I call if I want to call Europe?” Finally a name and a number to answer Henry Kissinger’s question

EU Parliament raises burning issues over the FTA with the US

Fair completion rules and the law of gravity don’t apply to banks

Deutsche Bank: the next financial crisis is here and the lenders need €150 billion from taxpayers

The European Commission to stop Buffering

MEPs and European Youth Forum call on EU to Invest in Youth

Will ECB win against low inflation by not following Quantitave Easing?

EU responds to terror fallout by eroding borderless Europe and molesting the refugees

EU Parliament and Council: Close to agreement on the bank resolution mechanism

EU finally agrees on target for 40% greenhouse emission cuts ahead of Paris climate talks

Making money from meeting the SDGs? An overarching approach to sustainable development.

EU’s Mogherini visits Turkey “to step up engagement” and highlight interests

Diana in Vietnam

MWC 2016 LIVE: Xiaomi looks to revive growth with flagships

Italy can stand the US rating agencies’ meaningless degrading

“China is the only BRICS country to have either met or possibly slightly surpassed my expectations”, BRICS inventor Jim O’ Neil from Switzerland; the Sting reports live from World Economic Forum 2015 in Davos

Resisting EU budget cuts

EU Trust Fund for Africa: Can it be beneficial for Italy and tackle the migration crisis in the Mediterranean?

The Brits are not an exception and that’s why they voted to leave

Is the European Banking Union an impossible task?

Trump to run America to the tune of his business affairs

Council’s position on Visa Directive a step back for young people’s mobility

Civil society organisations disenchanted with “Youth Guarantee”

The financial sector cripples Eurozone growth prospects

Zhua Zhou: Choosing The Future

Is Eurozone preparing to abandon austerity and stagnation?

EU Parliament semi worried over democratic deficit

Banks cannot die but can be fined

Competing with Apple and leading innovation: Google’s world replies to EU on android charges

Does the EU want GMOs and meat with hormones from the US?

EU security and defence industry prepares positions for ‘producers’ and ‘customers’

EU Council: Private web data to be protected by…abusers

My unlimited China

Towards a seamless internal EU market for industrial goods

Is it impossible to place the banks under control?

Who cares more about taxpayers? The US by being harsh on major banks or the EU still caressing them?

Schaeuble wants IMF out and bailouts ‘a la carte’ with Germany only to gain

The strong version of the EU banking union gains momentum

Economic sentiment and business climate stagnate in miserable euro area

Who and why want the EU-US trade agreement here and now

Draghi reserved about Eurozone’s growth prospects

“At the Environment Assembly citizens expect clean, not hot air”, the Head of UN Environment in Europe underscores in a Sting Exclusive

Q&A on the 19th China-EU Summit to be held on 01-02 June 2017 in Brussels

Doctors vs. Industry 4.0: who will win?

EU’s unsparing question to UK: now what kind of future relations do you want?

A Sting Exclusive: “Europe must be more ambitious in COP21 and lead on climate finance and sustainable development”, Green UK MEP Jean Lambert points out from Brussels

The consequences of Brexit seen by a European young entrepreneur

EU readies for eventual annulment of the Turkish agreement on immigrants-refugees

Learn from the margin, not the center: digital innovation with social impact as transformative force bridging digital divide

Tiny Iceland teaches the West how to treat bankers

What is the IMF telling Eurozone about fiscal and banking unification?

A long German political winter is on the way

Youth and children in Europe set the new perspectives for the decades to come

EU-US to miss 2015 deadline and even lose Germany’s support in TTIP’s darkest week yet

Preparing for developing countries the ‘Greek cure’

In dreams and in love there are no impossibilities

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s