What is the IMF telling Eurozone about fiscal and banking unification?

International Monetary Fund Managing Director Christine Lagarde delivers remarks at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce in Washington. (September 19, 2013, OIMF Staff Photograph/Stephen Jaffe).

International Monetary Fund Managing Director Christine Lagarde delivers remarks at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce in Washington. (September 19, 2013, OIMF Staff Photograph/Stephen Jaffe).

The International Monetary Fund questions the efforts of the European Union to establish effective fiscal discipline policy instruments and a smoothly functioning banking union in the euro area. In a survey entitled “More Fiscal Integration to Boost Euro Area Resilience”, the Fund analysts observe that “Crisis exposed important gaps in architecture of the euro area”. To cure this they suggest “Strengthened fiscal governance and cross-country insurance mechanisms”, while they insist, that the Banking Union in order to be credible, needs urgently a “common fiscal backstop”. In total they have four suggestions to make, three for the long run and one for immediate application.

In detail, this IMF analysis proposes three new policy tools to secure effective fiscal discipline in the long run. They suggest that, to this end, a good start will be the timely launching of such a policy package. In the short run they insist that the Banking Union in order to be credible, apart from the Single Supervisory Mechanism and a Single Resolution Mechanism, needs “a firm and early commitment to establish an adequate backstop to anchor confidence in the banking system”. They elaborate a bit further and say, “While some of the insurance against banking accidents should be funded by the industry, a common backstop for the recapitalization, resolution, and deposit insurance would contribute to reducing the risk of contagion”. In reality they propose more taxpayers’ implication in saving failing banks. No wonder why the IMF is renowned as the best friend of banks.

IMF analysts before coming to those conclusions described accurately the unfolding of the Eurozone crisis after 2008. In this process they underlined that the “problems arising in banks raised doubts about sovereign creditworthiness and in turn sovereign stress aggravated the pressure on banks’ balance sheets”. These were the cases of Ireland and Greece respectively, while Portugal, Spain and Italy suffered of both illnesses albeit in varying degrees. Concluding its fact finding endeavour, the IMF notes that, “The approach taken so far—dealing with crises after they occur—has been costly, not only in terms of direct financial assistance, but also in terms of lost output and increased unemployment”.

The fiscal front

Focusing on the latest efforts of the European Union to cover the institutional gap of the Monetary Union with the “two pack” and the “six pack” Directives, the IMF believes they are not enough. To accomplish a well-functioning fiscal union, the Fund has four suggestions. All of them are meant to secure the long term ability of Eurozone to face crisis and accidents; the last one however is designed to cover the institutional gap of the Banking Union, as it is currently under construction and consequently, of an urgent character.

The four suggestions

The four suggestions are the following: Better oversight of national policies and enforcement of rules, increasing risk sharing with cross-country fiscal insurance mechanisms, borrowing at the centre and last but not least, a fiscal backstop for euro area banks. Of course those suggestions go beyond the current political realities in Eurozone around a possible unification. Borrowing at the centre sounds already as politically too much for Eurozone’s 17 member states. The same is true for the cross-country fiscal insurance mechanism backed with a “euro area-wide rainy day fund, a common unemployment insurance scheme, or a budget for the euro area”. In any case this is what the IMF proposes.

As for the first and the last suggestions there is more to say, than briefly abolishing them on political grounds. The first suggestion asking for better oversight and stricter enforcement of rules is not very far away, from what the Eurozone has already decided with the “six pack”. To be reminded, those six Regulations go as far as to institutionalise central approval of member states government budgets, before they are submitted to national Parliaments. The Commission’s green light is a prerequisite. In view of that, the IMF accepts that “the design of fiscal policy has improved”.

What about our beloved banks?

Now, let’s pass to the last and most urgent suggestion the IMF addresses to Eurozone’s political leadership, namely “fiscal backstop for euro area banks”. This is equivalent to suggesting that Eurozone taxpayers should accept to cover a large part of bank resolution and recapitalisation cost. Seemingly the authors of this IMF study didn’t have the time luxury to know what the President of the European Central Bank, Mario Draghi, proposed last Monday.

As the European Sting observed last Tuesday Draghi proposed the following breakthrough novelty in enacting the Banking Union, “until the resolution fund is fully financed, it should be able to borrow from other sources, including national ones, to ensure that properly-funded resolution is an option from the start”. Putting together what Draghi has said in the past and this latest statement, what he proposes here is that at an initial stage, the resolution fund should be able to borrow not only from the European Stability Mechanism, but also from those governments in the territory of which the bank accident occurs. This is a double fiscal backstop in lenders’ resolution and recapitalisation: once through the ESM and a second time directly, through national governments’ contributions.

All in all, it is obvious that this IMF study sounds as ‘laboratory’ like in suggesting a complete fiscal unification of Eurozone and common sovereign borrowing. It ignores the prevailing political mood in Eurozone, with Eurosceptic and extremist political formations gaining momentum. As for the construction of the Banking Union, the current situation is far from clear. A lot will depend on the political developments in Germany around the formation of the next government, to be presented sooner or later to the Bundestag.

There is another possibility, however, over the targets that this IMF survey is aiming at. Probably its authors, knowing the political limitations of Eurozone, are trying to exploit and pronounce them in order to undercut somewhat the global role of the euro money.

 

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

We’ll succeed together

Youth and Participation: are the people rising up in Spain? 


The US will impose tariffs on Mexico, says President Trump

Japan’s holiest shrine is pulled down and rebuilt every 20 years – on purpose

Tax revenues continue increasing as the tax mix shifts further towards corporate and consumption taxes

One million facing food shortages, nutrition crisis after Mozambique cyclones: UNICEF

New Erasmus: more opportunities for disadvantaged youth

How the mobile industry is driving climate progress on the scale of a major economy

Happiness apps: how schools are joining the fight for better student mental health

Main results of EU-Japan summit: Tokyo, 17/07/2018

Can the national and age groups pockets of unemployment cause irreparable damages to Eurozone?

NASA has released new photos of the Apollo 11 moon landing

The European Commission to stop Buffering

Eurozone needs more than some decimals of growth

New EU rules ensure better protection for 120 million holidaymakers this summer

WEF Davos 2016 LIVE: “We need more Schengen but reinforce control!”, France’s Minister of Economy Emmanuel Macron emphasises from Davos

UN human rights chief fears world has grown numb to Syrian carnage

My Mothers

Millennials are transforming African farming

UN chief saddened at news of death of former US President George H.W. Bush

What happiness can teach us about how we measure human development

Why are wildfires getting worse?

UN Mission, community leaders, condemn South Sudan violence which left two dead at camp

Trump’s Russophiles under investigation, Europe remains ‘en garde’

The quality of health education around the globe

Ahead of street protests, UN rights chief urges Guatemalan Government to respect democratic freedoms

Crucial medical supplies airlifted to north-east Syria to meet ‘desperate need’

This disease once wiped out 60% of Europe’s population – and now it’s back

Foreign direct investments the success secrete of Eurozone

Why and how did ISIS and Muslim fundamentalism gain momentum this year?

Sudan: Amidst deaths, injuries, imprisonments, UNICEF stresses children’s protection ‘at all times’

Canada has high levels of well-being and solid growth but trade tensions and housing market pose risks while inclusiveness could be improved

Industrial producer prices on free fall and stagnant output

Art has the power to change the world, says this renowned Iranian muralist

UN News Daily #UNGA Guide: Mandela Peace Summit, Global Goals, Youth and Yemen

Peacekeeping chief honours Tanzanian troops in Zanzibar, a year on from deadly DR Congo attacks

Food safety: New rules to boost consumer trust approved by MEPs

Suicide in postpartum depression

Murder of Brazilian indigenous leader a ‘worrying symptom’ of land invasion

EU Commission announces Safe Harbour 2.0 and a wider Data protection reform

Guterres: Security Council’s African alliances ‘needed and appreciated more than ever’

Why ignoring women is costing financial services money

Libya’s migrants and refugees with tuberculosis ‘left to die’ in detention centres

Nearly four million North Koreans in urgent need, as food production slumps by almost 10 per cent

Brussels Vs. Google: The €1 bn EU fine and the US response

Parliament to vote on new European Commission on 27 November

On European immigration: Europe’s Missing Citizens

Humanitarian visas to avoid refugees’ deaths

Why do US presidential elections last so long? And 4 other things you need to know

Human Rights breaches in Saudi Arabia, Chechnya and Zimbabwe

Car rentals: EU action leads to clearer and more transparent pricing

Visa liberalisation: Commission reports on fulfilment of visa-free requirements by Western Balkans and Eastern Partnership countries

Ebola outbreak in DR Congo conflict zone ‘remains dangerous and unpredictable’ – UN chiefs

ITU Telecom World 2016: it’s all about working together

EU to lead one more fight against climate change at G7 summit

The European Commission cuts roaming charges. But “it’s not enough”…

Bid to raise $5.5 billion for millions of Syrians and their host communities

Security Union: Significant progress and tangible results over past years but efforts must continue

Is there a drug for every disease?

Korea should adapt its migration programmes to ensure continued success in the face of expected challenges

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s