EU summit: No energy against tax evasion and fraud

From left to right: Enrico Letta, Italian Prime Minister; David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. Yesterday in Brussels everybody wanted to meet with the new Italian Prime Minister. (European Council photographic library).

From left to right: Enrico Letta, Italian Prime Minister, David Cameron, UK Prime Minister. Yesterday in Brussels everybody wanted to meet with the new Italian Prime Minister. (European Council photographic library).

As the European Sting predicted early yesterday morning, the European Council meeting of 22 May, which regrouped once more the 27 EU leaders, turned out poor results on both subjects that occupied its agenda, namely ‘energy’ and ‘taxation’. Sting writer Maria Milouv wrote, “the European Council of the 27 EU leaders has only ‘energy’ and ‘taxation’ in its agenda today, with poor results expected on both accounts”. Reading carefully the account, produced after the meeting  by Manuel Barroso, the President of the Commission, about what happened yesterday in the Council, is very enlightening. But let’s take one thing at a time.

Before enterprising to understand what the 27 EU leaders truly decided yesterday on energy and taxation, and having this Barroso account as a guide for that, one should keep in mind that the Commission President would have never denounced an EU leaders’ gathering as a waste of time and money. Nor would have he accepted openly that the so many and widely diverging interests, kept this Council impotent and incapable of taking any ground breaking decision.

No energy surplus

Now turning to Barroso’s report about what the 27 leaders decided yesterday over ‘energy’, he starts with the usual self reassuring comments about Commission’s ‘excellent’ work and his own contribution, when he “presented at the beginning of the meeting different scenarios and policy recommendations”. However right in the next sentence of his press release Barroso accepts that, “The reality is that the global energy landscape is changing very quickly and not in Europe’s favour. But we should not be resigned to that”.

Reading the last few words one should understand that the EU is now practically ‘resigned’, because there are so many things happening in the world in the energy sector, which leave Europe at least stupefied if not paralytic. These comments coming from the President of the Commission after yesterday’s European Council are at least alarming. It is a clear statement that Europe as a whole is not able to take course changing decisions, because it is paralysed by the contradicting interest of its core member states.

Actually what could possibly have in common, Britain and Germany for example, in this crucial sector? In order to make sure that the 27 leaders didn’t take any serious and concrete investment promoting decision yesterday, one may also read the account of Wall Street Journal about that. The writer of WSJ didn’t try to figure what was the real meaning of the lengthy European Council conclusions text. Instead, the prestigious newspaper must have asked the “chief executives of eight leading energy utilities” what do they make out of this EU Council. All of them replied that they are disillusioned with the EU‘s fragmented energy markets and criticised the 27 leaders for not introducing any concrete investment favouring measure.

No doubt then that the 27 EU leading politicians did nothing to change the deteriorating situation of the EU’s energy sector. As a matter of fact this is not true for all member states, because most of them have made diverging strategic choices. Germany for example has long decided to cling to the Russian gas, while Britain’s options are open to the seas and France supports nuclear energy. Given that It is really impossible to find a solid common ground, in order to build a real EU common energy policy. Consequently the 27 leaders couldn’t decide anything important yesterday.

More tax evasion

Now what about the fight against tax evasion and fraud? Let’s follow once more Manuel Barroso. His disappointment is more obvious in this domain, and this is detectable even from the first sentences of his account. After observing that the fight against tax evasion is the least the European political leadership could do to restore some traces of ‘fairness’ in the old continent, he is obliged to recognise that. “This discussion didn’t start today. In fact, as the President of the European Council said, some of these issues are already on that table. Five years ago the Commission has put forward proposals for instance in terms of saving, the Tax Savings Directive. The reality is that until now these discussions have been more or less blocked”.

Not a word that those issues were unblocked yesterday, quite the contrary. Logically, if the President of the Commission is obliged to accept that this issue has been blocked by the politicians who rule the Union, the reality must have been much worse. For example Britain may have said it prefer to altogether abandon the European Union, than accepting to shut down its offshore tax havens in the Channel Islands, the Island of Man and many more other islands all over the world. If those money paradises stop feeding the London City’s money machine, Britain would be in a really desperate position. For this country the reality is that the world’s tax evasion and other kinds of black money generating activities are life blood.

In any case Barroso was obliged to find something in yesterday’s gathering of EU leaders, to justify it and be happy about. In view of that he wrote, “Indeed there was a reference to a principle that I believe it is critically important – the principle of automatic exchange of (tax) information at European Union level”. This is also an old story and goes like that. The European Commission is trying for a long time now to create a system of automatic and mandatory exchange of information between the 27 tax authorities, including information about bank accounts of EU citizens. With the pretext that Austria and Luxembourg deny it, the issue remains frozen. Barroso very carefully observes that “there was a reference”, over that. This is far from an agreement, if words still keep their meaning.

In short yesterday’s meeting of the 27 EU leaders was a sheer waste of time and money. Unless the leaders found the opportunity to discuss other burning issues, outside the official meeting room. Probably the creation of the European Banking Union was one of them. Surely the Italian Prime Minister, Enrico Letta, must have devoted all his energy to that.

the sting Milestones

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

European Commission: the LED lights of your Audi A6 shall save our planet

A new approach to scaling-up renewable power in emerging markets

Ensure that widows are ‘not left out or left behind’, UN chief urges on International Day

COVID-19 wave III and the lessons learned

Threats from mammoth banks and Brussels fuel May’s poll rates

EU and Amazon cut deal to end antitrust investigation over e-books deals

MEPs urge EU countries to be transparent about their COVID-19 vaccine supplies

Here’s how private investors can turn plastic into gold

Still a long way to go to achieve gender equality in all EU countries

Africa is set to get its first vertical forest

‘Millions facing starvation’ – Global political and business leaders on the economic impact of COVID-19

How the gender commuting gap could be harming women’s careers

Will 2020 be the year blockchain overcomes its hype?

Progress in medical research: leading or lagging behind?

Bacteria vs. humans: how to fight in this world war?

The future of energy is being shaped in Asia

What we know and what we don’t know about universal basic income

The first new university in the UK for 40 years is taking a very different approach to education

OECD household income up 0.7% in first quarter of 2018, outpacing GDP growth

First seat projections for the next European Parliament

The energy industry is changing. Are governments switched on?

What is the IMF telling Eurozone about fiscal and banking unification?

Trump ‘used’ G20 to side with Putin and split climate and trade packs


Re-thinking citizenship education: bringing young people back to the ballot box

Commission issues guidance on the participation of third country bidders in the EU procurement market

Car rentals: EU action leads to clearer and more transparent pricing

What’s going on in Chernobyl today?

Here’s how we get businesses to harmonize on climate change

Why are the Balkans’ political leaders meeting in Geneva this week?

Support for EU remains at historically high level despite sceptics

US pardons for accused war criminals, contrary to international law: UN rights office

European Business Summit 2015: In search of a vision for the future

Brexit casts a shadow over the LSE – Deutsche Börse merger: a tracer of how or if brexit is to be implemented

Migrants and refugees face higher risk of developing ill-health, says UN report on displaced people in Europe

Autumn 2019 Standard Eurobarometer: immigration and climate change remain main concerns at EU level

Stop the waste: UN food agencies call for action to reduce global hunger

The term AI overpromises. Let’s make machine learning work better for humans instead

How blended finance helped to keep energy supplies flowing during COVID-19

What will a post-pandemic economy look like? Here’s what chief economists expect

Innovation is the key to the pay-TV industry’s long-term growth

Mergers: Commission approves GlaxoSmithKline’s acquisition of Pfizer’s Consumer Health Business, subject to conditions

Coronavirus: Commission launches call for innovative response and recovery partnerships between EU regions

Parliament names radio studio after journalists murdered in December attack

4 things to know about the state of conflict today

World-famous cultural institutions closed due to coronavirus are welcoming virtual visitors

As Houthi forces withdraw from key Yemeni ports, UN monitoring chief welcomes ‘first practical step on the ground’

Get out, stay out: how financial resilience helps end poverty

The ‘ASEAN way’: what it is, how it must change for the future

30 years of tissue engineering, what has been achieved?

Businesses are lacking moral leadership, according to employees

Mental health and suicide prevention

‘Perseverance is key’ to Iraq’s future, UN envoy tells Security Council

Belgium: Youth Forum takes legal step to ban unpaid internships

European Commission recommends common EU approach to the security of 5G networks

The Future of Balkans: Embracing Education

The European Parliament fails to really restrict the rating agencies

Gas pipeline in the European Union. (Copyright: EU, 2012 / Source: EC - Audiovisual Service / Photo: Ferenc Isza)

EU Investment Bank approves € 1.5bn loan for Trans Adriatic Pipeline (TAP)

Could Europe become the first climate-neutral continent?

Venezuela’s needs ‘significant and growing’ UN humanitarian chief warns Security Council, as ‘unparalleled’ exodus continues

More Stings?

Comments

  1. I do not even know how I ended up here, but I thought this post was great.
    I do not know who you are but certainly you are going to a famous blogger if you are not already 😉 Cheers!

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s