EU decides “in absentia” of civil society

Civil Society Day 2013 at the European Economic and Social Committee in Brussels (EESC photographic library 6-3-2013).

Civil Society Day 2013 at the European Economic and Social Committee in Brussels (EESC photographic library, 6-3-2013).

The European Economic and Social Committee and other European civil society organisations and networks organised this year’s Civil Society Day on Wednesday 6 March at the EESC premises in Brussels. The main and burning conclusion from this event was that the EU decision-making procedures are taking place “in absentia” of any legitimisation by civil society representatives, who could transfer authentically the will of people, who sweat in the real economy. It’s impossible to set effective and functional rules on the economy, in a democratic vacuum. It never worked in history nor will it now. You hear that Mr Rehn?

According to organisers of this important event that unfortunately didn’t attract the attention of major media, more than, “250 civil society representatives gathered in Brussels to seek ways in which the young and old in Europe could gain better knowledge of their EU rights and become involved in the democratic life of the Union. Participants called on the EU institutions to stop putting procedures before results and involve citizens in actions and campaigns that affect them directly”. Obviously, the people who gathered there were not only interested in the way the EU is influencing their economic daily lives. They have also a strong interest on the way this influence is decided upon.

Democratic legitimisation

In short, democracy was their main concern. This is an instinctive reaction by the average European citizen to what is happening today in the Old Continent. People know deep in their minds that if democracy is functioning well, their personal economic affairs would depend mainly on their own efforts and nobody would dare taking away from them what is rightfully theirs. In short, they know that democracy guarantees everybody the freedom to control one’s own personal economic status and prospects. The question is then do Europeans have any reason to worry for that? Unfortunately, it seems they have.

At least, this is what the more than 250 Europeans, who authentically represent the civil society of the EU, think. Otherwise, it is difficult to explain why in their conclusions, while addressing themselves to the EU authorities, they proclaimed that, “If the EU wants to regain the trust of its citizens and continue to operate, then all governments, EU leaders and civil society stakeholders must make the case for EU reform”. This expression, “if the EU wants to regain…” is an indirect but very clear observation, that presently the EU has lost the trust of the civil society. Unfortunately, this is what the Sting has also concluded during the few months of its existence.

This civil society people gathering in its final communique also stressed that, “European leaders can no longer rely solely on elected politicians to pass on messages from their citizens. They also need civil society to ensure that their policies are more firmly rooted in citizens’ concerns, and to make their decisions more legitimate. Civil society represents millions of Europeans in all walks of life”. Why is that so? Aren’t politicians voted by people?

Obviously,the answer to this question is a straight yes. But politicians do not appear from parthenogenesis. They are being promoted by the party and the wider political, business and media “system”. That is why the civil society representatives underline the need, for “civil society to ensure that their policies are more firmly rooted in citizens’ concerns”.

The opposite direction

It is well established then that, in order to secure a more legitimised system of EU decision-making, civil society representatives need to play an enhanced role. This issue becomes every day even more urgent, because the “economic governance” of the Union has been lately bestowed, to non-elected decision makers in the Commission and the European Central Bank. By the same token, the latest developments in Brussels and Frankfurt are infallible witnesses that the democratic legitimisation of strategic economic policies is non-existent or of play a minor role.

The implication of the European Parliament in the adoption of important measures is restricted, by the very nature of this body. No real civil society implication is foreseen in the Brussels and Frankfurt decision-making procedures. The EESC is a very weak voice not affecting the main decision taking procedures, and unfortunately ,there is evidence indicating that this tendency is not changing. On the contrary, democratic legitimisation is increasingly chased away from where it counts.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the European Sting Milestones

Featured Stings

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Tuesday’s Daily Brief: Guterres calls for restraint in Venezuela, Jazz Day, the importance of breastfeeding, and updates from Libya, Iran and Mozambique

Hundreds of wounded Gaza protesters risk limb amputation without immediate help, warns top UN official

Boom in Artificial Intelligence patents, points to ‘quantum leap’ in tech: UN report

Children are forgetting the names for plants and animals

EU-Vietnam: Council adopts decisions to sign trade and investment agreements

The US is withdrawing from a 144-year-old treaty. Here’s the context

This is why Denmark, Sweden and Germany are considering a meat tax

Without tackling ‘gross inequalities’ major issues will go unsolved, warns UN rights chief Bachelet

Helping small businesses fight cybercrime benefits the global ecosystem

Autumn 2018 Economic Forecast: sustained but less dynamic growth amid high uncertainty

A day in the life of a refugee: the wait

The psychology of pandemics

Does it pay for cities to be green?

The time is up but the game is still not over for Greece: negotiations continue in anticipation of a new deal

European Commission and four online marketplaces sign a Product Safety Pledge to remove dangerous products

Will Merkel ever steer the EU migration Titanic and restore her power in Germany?

Intervene, don’t overthink – the new mantra of systems design

Can India reduce deaths on one hazardous road to zero? This group is trying

Is Britain to sail alone in the high seas of trade wars?

GSMA announces speakers for Mobile 360 Series-West Africa

Ten UN peacekeepers killed in a terrorist attack in northern Mali

European Employment Forum 2013 and not European Unemployment Forum 2014

Good Governance in developing modern quality infrastructure systems

Peru should help more young vulnerable people into work

EU security and defence industry prepares positions for ‘producers’ and ‘customers’

How to build a digital infrastructure that benefits emerging economies

Innovation for a smarter world: ITU Telecom World 2018

In Libya, Guterres ‘deeply concerned’ by risk of fresh military confrontation, urges restraint

Theresa May’s global Britain against Philip Hammond’s Brexit fog

Commission facilitates the activities of ‘merchants of labour’

Easing funding woes for UN agency assisting Palestine refugees a ‘wise investment for today and the future’

Superconductors: the miracle materials powering an energy revolution

Foreign direct investments the success secrete of Eurozone

“Who do I call if I want to call Europe?” Finally a name and a number to answer Henry Kissinger’s question

The latest emoji are more inclusive – but who approves them?

5 ways Denmark is preparing for the future of work

More than one million sexually transmitted infections occur every day: WHO

Forests ‘essential’ for the future, UN agriculture chief spells out in new report

Unemployment and exclusion brings EU cities to boiling point

Utmost hypocrisy emitted by EU’s energy regulation

OECD: Mind the financial gap that lies ahead

Digital transformation and the rise of the ‘superjob’

These cities score an ‘A’ for environmental action – but hundreds more are falling behind

Ebola: EU provides an additional €30 million to tackle the outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo

Will the EU reconsider Frontex’s role in light of accusations about violations of migrants’ human rights?

A day in the life of a refugee: the role of nations and citizens of the world

UN health agency identifies 5-year-old Congolese boy as first confirmed case of Ebola in Uganda

The Commission sees ‘moderate recovery’ but prospects deteriorate

Medical students: The need for emigration

UN human rights chief denounces grave ‘assaults’ on fundamental rights of Palestinian people

African migration: what the numbers really tell us

Trade Committee advocates lower tariffs in Western Sahara

We can make sure Globalization 4.0 leaves no one behind. This is how

Take-home pay growing at lowest level since 2008, as gender-gap persists: UN labour agency

UN chief praises Japanese climate resilience, as Typhoon Hagibis cleanup begins

An EU first: youth Ministers debate youth participation in live broadcast

Electronic Cigarettes: A booster or alternative to Smoking?

Science is ‘key’ to pushing forward the 2030 Agenda, UN development forum told

Air pollution could be responsible for 1 in 7 new cases of diabetes

The West definitively cuts Russia off from the developed world

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s