EU decides “in absentia” of civil society

Civil Society Day 2013 at the European Economic and Social Committee in Brussels (EESC photographic library 6-3-2013).

Civil Society Day 2013 at the European Economic and Social Committee in Brussels (EESC photographic library, 6-3-2013).

The European Economic and Social Committee and other European civil society organisations and networks organised this year’s Civil Society Day on Wednesday 6 March at the EESC premises in Brussels. The main and burning conclusion from this event was that the EU decision-making procedures are taking place “in absentia” of any legitimisation by civil society representatives, who could transfer authentically the will of people, who sweat in the real economy. It’s impossible to set effective and functional rules on the economy, in a democratic vacuum. It never worked in history nor will it now. You hear that Mr Rehn?

According to organisers of this important event that unfortunately didn’t attract the attention of major media, more than, “250 civil society representatives gathered in Brussels to seek ways in which the young and old in Europe could gain better knowledge of their EU rights and become involved in the democratic life of the Union. Participants called on the EU institutions to stop putting procedures before results and involve citizens in actions and campaigns that affect them directly”. Obviously, the people who gathered there were not only interested in the way the EU is influencing their economic daily lives. They have also a strong interest on the way this influence is decided upon.

Democratic legitimisation

In short, democracy was their main concern. This is an instinctive reaction by the average European citizen to what is happening today in the Old Continent. People know deep in their minds that if democracy is functioning well, their personal economic affairs would depend mainly on their own efforts and nobody would dare taking away from them what is rightfully theirs. In short, they know that democracy guarantees everybody the freedom to control one’s own personal economic status and prospects. The question is then do Europeans have any reason to worry for that? Unfortunately, it seems they have.

At least, this is what the more than 250 Europeans, who authentically represent the civil society of the EU, think. Otherwise, it is difficult to explain why in their conclusions, while addressing themselves to the EU authorities, they proclaimed that, “If the EU wants to regain the trust of its citizens and continue to operate, then all governments, EU leaders and civil society stakeholders must make the case for EU reform”. This expression, “if the EU wants to regain…” is an indirect but very clear observation, that presently the EU has lost the trust of the civil society. Unfortunately, this is what the Sting has also concluded during the few months of its existence.

This civil society people gathering in its final communique also stressed that, “European leaders can no longer rely solely on elected politicians to pass on messages from their citizens. They also need civil society to ensure that their policies are more firmly rooted in citizens’ concerns, and to make their decisions more legitimate. Civil society represents millions of Europeans in all walks of life”. Why is that so? Aren’t politicians voted by people?

Obviously,the answer to this question is a straight yes. But politicians do not appear from parthenogenesis. They are being promoted by the party and the wider political, business and media “system”. That is why the civil society representatives underline the need, for “civil society to ensure that their policies are more firmly rooted in citizens’ concerns”.

The opposite direction

It is well established then that, in order to secure a more legitimised system of EU decision-making, civil society representatives need to play an enhanced role. This issue becomes every day even more urgent, because the “economic governance” of the Union has been lately bestowed, to non-elected decision makers in the Commission and the European Central Bank. By the same token, the latest developments in Brussels and Frankfurt are infallible witnesses that the democratic legitimisation of strategic economic policies is non-existent or of play a minor role.

The implication of the European Parliament in the adoption of important measures is restricted, by the very nature of this body. No real civil society implication is foreseen in the Brussels and Frankfurt decision-making procedures. The EESC is a very weak voice not affecting the main decision taking procedures, and unfortunately ,there is evidence indicating that this tendency is not changing. On the contrary, democratic legitimisation is increasingly chased away from where it counts.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Banks must take bold action to fight climate change. This is how they can do it

Innovation is the key to the pay-TV industry’s long-term growth

Mali: Presidential elections critical to consolidate democracy, says UN peacekeeping chief

US-North Korea summit in Singapore ‘a promising development’ says Guterres

China Unlimited Special Report: at the heart of Beijing

Kenya wants to run entirely on green energy by 2020

Palestine refugee agency chief resigns amidst mismanagement probe

‘No other possibility but to leave’: UN News special report from the Nigeria-Cameroon border as 35,000 newly-displaced seek safety

UN postal agency ‘regrets’ US withdrawal

Plants, the ‘core basis for life on Earth’, under increasing threat, warns UN food agency

Bias in AI is a real problem. Here’s what we should do about it

GSMA Mobile 360 – Digital Societies in Kuala Lumpur, in association with The European Sting

Germany may have a stable and more cooperative government

Gender inequality in the medicine field: two commonly issues

MEPs call on Russia to stop illegitimate prosecution of Lithuanian judges

A world first: Women at the helm of every UN Regional Commission

3 ways to ensure the internet’s future is creative, collaborative and fair

EU Commission challenges Berlin by proposing breakthrough legislation on banks

Sochi not far away from Ukraine

We have solutions to crime. We just need to scale them

Strawberries and child support; a Thai partnership

Promoting ‘a healthy sustainable future’, the UN health agency engages young and young at heart to ‘Walk the Talk’

De Gucht: More gaffes with the talks on the EU-US free trade agreement

FROM THE FIELD: Enslaved Guatemalan indigenous women wait for reparations

As a rising global power, what is India’s vision for the world?

The Sichuan Province of China presents its cultural treasure to the EU

Is a uniform CO2 emission linked car taxation possible in the EU?

Job automation risks vary widely across different regions within countries

EU steps up economic partnership with Kenya to boost job creation

Young people demand a transparent job market: new campaign launches on international interns day

The Indian miracle state pointing the way to global sustainability

EU to negotiate an FTA with Japan

5 surprising ways major cities are going green

Migrants: ‘A powerful driver’ of economic growth, ‘dynamism and understanding’

The Parliament defies a politically biased Banking Union

‘Be the change’ we desperately need, UN deputy chief urges global youth

5 technologies that will forever change global trade

Eurozone bank rescues ‘a la carte’ until 2015 then only bail-ins

Macron defends the idea of European sovereignty

Changing for the change: Medicine in Industry 4.0

EU Commission spends billions without achieving targets

Gender Science: A sneaky healthcare risk factor

Luxembourg has achieved high levels of growth and well-being but must do more to preserve and share prosperity

Annexing Jordan Valley would end ‘illusion’ of a meaningful two-State solution: UN rights expert

The European Sting live from the World Economic Forum 2015 in Davos

Global leaders and companies pledge to reduce the gender pay gap by 2030

The Banking Union may lead to a Germanic Europe

Commission goes less than mid-way on expensive euro

Heat stress spike predicted to cost global economy $2,400 billion a year

‘No safe way’ into battle-scarred Afghan city of Ghazni to deliver aid as traumatized children search for parents

No patents on naturally obtained plants and seeds

COP21 Breaking News_08 December: Cities & Regions Launch Major Five-Year Vision to Take Action on Climate Change

Why climate change matters for future health professionals

Why capital markets have no more reservetions about Eurozone

Commission proposes a governance framework for the Budgetary Instrument for Convergence and Competitiveness

Actions not words: what was promised at the UN’s landmark climate summit?

Global trade is broken. Here are five ways to rebuild it

3 things to know about India’s space programme

Statement by the Brexit Steering Group on UK government White paper

Climate Change : An Already Health Emergency

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s