Dark spots on EU humanitarian aid spending

Visit by Kristalina Georgieva, Member of the EC in charge of International Cooperation, Humanitarian Aid and Crisis Response to Jordan. (EC Audiovisual Services). A baby and a happy mother are basics on occasions like that.  God knows what happens to them next.

Visit by Kristalina Georgieva, Member of the EC in charge of International Cooperation, Humanitarian Aid and Crisis Response to Jordan. (EC Audiovisual Services). A baby and a happy mother are basics on occasions like that. God knows what happens to them next.

The European Commission published an announcement on Thursday 10 January to inform us all, “Where the European Commission’s humanitarian aid will go in 2013”. A lot of people went through the text and what they got was just general information on how much money will go to a number of Sub Saharan African countries.Only one number per country (the amount to be spent) is revealed and that was all. No information was given about who will receive the money or goods and how they are going to be distributed on the spot.

There are many reports however by independent sources saying that the goods being distributed under western humanitarian aid banner appear in the black markets of the countries’ in question and this as a standard practice. In total the annual budget of EU’s humanitarian aid can reach as much as €1.3 billion, as it did last year. Let’s see how superficial the Commission’s information is, by following the two more important parts of the announcement.

The first part goes like that: “The European Commission has just adopted its plan for the allocation of over €661 million in humanitarian aid funding for 2013. This so-called World-Wide Decision on Humanitarian Aid will be the financial backbone of the Commission’s humanitarian aid operational strategy for 2013. The Commission will fund humanitarian interventions run by more than 200 of its partner organisations in nearly 80 countries or regions.

Based on an in-depth assessment of the needs of the most vulnerable populations in the world, the five largest humanitarian operations will be in the Sahel region of West Africa, including further response to the conflict in Mali (€82 million), Sudan and South Sudan (€80 million), the Democratic Republic of Congo (€54 million), Pakistan (€42 million) and Somalia (€40 million). All of these are large-scale, protracted crises resulting from conflict, food shortages or both. Geographically, the largest portion of aid will go to sub-Saharan Africa to which €344.5 million, representing 52% of the Commission’s pre-programmed humanitarian funding, is targeted”.

That is all one can get about how €344.5 million of our money will be spent. For those who have experience how things are functioning in sub-Saharan Africa, this information says nothing at all, if it is not intentionally elliptic so as the Commission can have it the way it wants. This does not necessarily mean that there are dark points on the way the Commission is doing its business.

For those who have experience of similar matters however, the problem lies on what is happening after the EU humanitarian aid lands in those countries or after the money is pocketed by international organisations specialising on aid distribution. Who is responsible of distributing it on the spot, and more importantly how it can be safely transported to the far-away places, where aid is badly needed and be handed over to those whom it is meant by Brussels to reach?

The Commission’s announcement takes care only of what the European taxpayer is going to spend and it goes like this: “In addition to the €661 million that the Commission has allocated to the most intractable humanitarian problems around the globe, reserve resources are available during the year for unpredictable crises and disasters. In 2012 the entire reserve was used due to major disasters in the Sahel region of West Africa, the escalation of the conflict in Syria, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Sudan, all of which caused renewed violence against civilians and displacement. These additional emergency responses brought the total amount of humanitarian funding from the Commission to nearly €1.3 billion in 2012, the Commission’s highest ever annual spending on humanitarian aid”.

With €1.3bn one can turn sub-Saharan Africa upside-down and despite the huge character of this amount there isn’t exact information about how it is spent. No tables, no any other detailed information. Going through the official documents on EU’s humanitarian aid one finds a lot of talk on principles, international law, good humanitarian donorship practice, acceptance of United Nations coordinating role and all that, but nothing concrete on how all that money is spent. It is probably certain than on the Commission’s ledgers the accounts are in order but it is not at all easy to have a look on that.

The Court of Auditors however can and has published its observations on how the EU’s taxpayer money is spent on humanitarian or other kind of aid in a large number of recipient countries. The Court observes that testing a sample of transactions of that kind 33% of them were “affected by error”. This means that one out of three transactions may contain dark spots. Of course the Court of Auditors has access only to European Commission’s books and not of those of recipient countries or of the intermediating organisations. One can imagine what may be found there if there is anything written down.

Another observation that the Court of Auditors makes is with reference on the way the EU’s aid money is spent in cooperation with other international bodies implicated in the aid business. The court calls those contributions as “fungible”.

In any case nothing is clear when one starts digging in the way the EU aid money is spent and this affair leaves a lot of room for negative thinking.

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

How a 3-point plan could help rebuild business for the long-term

Unemployment and immigrants haunt the EU; who can offer relief?

5 key concepts for blockchain newbies

This Brooklyn farm company is training a new generation of urban farmers

Harnessing the power of nature in the fight against climate change

TTIP wins first crucial EU test: MEPs give in to the trade agreement

We underestimate the power of data at our peril. This is why

6 steps every country must take now to prevent coronavirus deaths: WHO Director-General

Here’s how to achieve growth in the Middle East and North Africa

Why global collaboration is needed to protect against a new generation of cyber threats

This is why Denmark, Sweden and Germany are considering a meat tax

EU Summit: Why was Poland isolated in opposing Tusk and the ‘multi speed’ Europe

Here are three ways organizations can prepare for tomorrow’s world

This young scientist is tackling food insecurity for the world’s most vulnerable groups

Mandatory Transparency Register: political meeting to restart negotiations

EU finally to extend sanctions on Russia despite arguments; Greece again in Europe’s spotlight

Remain united for Syrians, UN envoy de Mistura urges Security Council

5 surprising ways major cities are going green

Global growth is slowing amid rising trade and financial risks

OECD Secretary-General: coronavirus “war” demands joint action

Innovation for a smarter world: ITU Telecom World 2018

The ethics of the Medical Technology Civilisation era

How nudge theory can help empty our plastic-filled ‘drawers of shame’

From memes to mourning, how Europe is dealing with its darkest hour since World War II

Thought AIs could never replace human imagination? Think again

UN condemns deadly attack against G5 Sahel force headquarters in Mali

New report says better metrics could have prompted stronger response to the crisis

5 ways to integrate Syrian refugees into the workforce

Twenty days that may remold the future of Europe

Half the world’s refugee children not in school, UN agency finds

5 charts that show renewable energy’s latest milestone

Personalized healthcare and better population health? Here’s how digital can help achieve that

UN chief urges Somalis not to be ‘deterred’ by latest deadly terror attack

Silk Road Unlimited

Is Germany closer to Russia than the West? Nord Stream II and Iran count more

Libyan authorities must shoulder the burden to support country’s ‘vulnerable’ south

8 fascinating and fearsome frontiers of science you should know about

European Union signs aviation agreement with the Republic of Korea

YouTube stars get creative at UN, to promote tolerance

Electronic cigarettes – The alternative we’ve been looking for?

How one change to shipping goods could change the way we live

Libya on verge of civil war, threatening ‘permanent division’, top UN official warns Security Council

‘12 million’ stateless people globally, warns UNHCR chief in call to States for decisive action

Global leaders and companies pledge to reduce the gender pay gap by 2030

Gloomy new statistics signify no end to Eurozone’s economic misery

There is a forgotten solution to climate change that we must invest in – nature

FROM THE FIELD: India’s plastic waste revolution

EU continues targeting on Chinese steel imports instead of the revival of its own economy

False promises to Small and Medium Enterprises

‘Shared responsibility’ to stop 420,000 needless deaths from tainted food each year, UN, world leaders warn

IMF asks Europe to decide on bank resolutions and the Greek Gordian knot

Making money from meeting the SDGs? An overarching approach to sustainable development.

80,000 youngsters at risk in DRC after forcible expulsion from Angola: UNICEF

Mergers: Commission approves Assa Abloy’s acquisition of Agta Record, subject to conditions

We won’t win the online security war without people power

Draghi, Letta: All Eurozone countries must be able to borrow like Germany

UN rights chief calls for release of hundreds abducted and abused in South Sudan

Privatisation and public health: a question of Human Rights

MEPs back measures to reconcile career and private life

The ethical dilemmas of medicine

More Stings?


Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s