Dark spots on EU humanitarian aid spending

Visit by Kristalina Georgieva, Member of the EC in charge of International Cooperation, Humanitarian Aid and Crisis Response to Jordan. (EC Audiovisual Services). A baby and a happy mother are basics on occasions like that.  God knows what happens to them next.

Visit by Kristalina Georgieva, Member of the EC in charge of International Cooperation, Humanitarian Aid and Crisis Response to Jordan. (EC Audiovisual Services). A baby and a happy mother are basics on occasions like that. God knows what happens to them next.

The European Commission published an announcement on Thursday 10 January to inform us all, “Where the European Commission’s humanitarian aid will go in 2013”. A lot of people went through the text and what they got was just general information on how much money will go to a number of Sub Saharan African countries.Only one number per country (the amount to be spent) is revealed and that was all. No information was given about who will receive the money or goods and how they are going to be distributed on the spot.

There are many reports however by independent sources saying that the goods being distributed under western humanitarian aid banner appear in the black markets of the countries’ in question and this as a standard practice. In total the annual budget of EU’s humanitarian aid can reach as much as €1.3 billion, as it did last year. Let’s see how superficial the Commission’s information is, by following the two more important parts of the announcement.

The first part goes like that: “The European Commission has just adopted its plan for the allocation of over €661 million in humanitarian aid funding for 2013. This so-called World-Wide Decision on Humanitarian Aid will be the financial backbone of the Commission’s humanitarian aid operational strategy for 2013. The Commission will fund humanitarian interventions run by more than 200 of its partner organisations in nearly 80 countries or regions.

Based on an in-depth assessment of the needs of the most vulnerable populations in the world, the five largest humanitarian operations will be in the Sahel region of West Africa, including further response to the conflict in Mali (€82 million), Sudan and South Sudan (€80 million), the Democratic Republic of Congo (€54 million), Pakistan (€42 million) and Somalia (€40 million). All of these are large-scale, protracted crises resulting from conflict, food shortages or both. Geographically, the largest portion of aid will go to sub-Saharan Africa to which €344.5 million, representing 52% of the Commission’s pre-programmed humanitarian funding, is targeted”.

That is all one can get about how €344.5 million of our money will be spent. For those who have experience how things are functioning in sub-Saharan Africa, this information says nothing at all, if it is not intentionally elliptic so as the Commission can have it the way it wants. This does not necessarily mean that there are dark points on the way the Commission is doing its business.

For those who have experience of similar matters however, the problem lies on what is happening after the EU humanitarian aid lands in those countries or after the money is pocketed by international organisations specialising on aid distribution. Who is responsible of distributing it on the spot, and more importantly how it can be safely transported to the far-away places, where aid is badly needed and be handed over to those whom it is meant by Brussels to reach?

The Commission’s announcement takes care only of what the European taxpayer is going to spend and it goes like this: “In addition to the €661 million that the Commission has allocated to the most intractable humanitarian problems around the globe, reserve resources are available during the year for unpredictable crises and disasters. In 2012 the entire reserve was used due to major disasters in the Sahel region of West Africa, the escalation of the conflict in Syria, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Sudan, all of which caused renewed violence against civilians and displacement. These additional emergency responses brought the total amount of humanitarian funding from the Commission to nearly €1.3 billion in 2012, the Commission’s highest ever annual spending on humanitarian aid”.

With €1.3bn one can turn sub-Saharan Africa upside-down and despite the huge character of this amount there isn’t exact information about how it is spent. No tables, no any other detailed information. Going through the official documents on EU’s humanitarian aid one finds a lot of talk on principles, international law, good humanitarian donorship practice, acceptance of United Nations coordinating role and all that, but nothing concrete on how all that money is spent. It is probably certain than on the Commission’s ledgers the accounts are in order but it is not at all easy to have a look on that.

The Court of Auditors however can and has published its observations on how the EU’s taxpayer money is spent on humanitarian or other kind of aid in a large number of recipient countries. The Court observes that testing a sample of transactions of that kind 33% of them were “affected by error”. This means that one out of three transactions may contain dark spots. Of course the Court of Auditors has access only to European Commission’s books and not of those of recipient countries or of the intermediating organisations. One can imagine what may be found there if there is anything written down.

Another observation that the Court of Auditors makes is with reference on the way the EU’s aid money is spent in cooperation with other international bodies implicated in the aid business. The court calls those contributions as “fungible”.

In any case nothing is clear when one starts digging in the way the EU aid money is spent and this affair leaves a lot of room for negative thinking.

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the European Sting Milestones

Featured Stings

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

OECD economic scenarios to 2060 illustrate the long-run benefits of structural reforms

Cybersecurity needs a holistic approach. Here are three ways to build protection

UN forum to bring ‘big space data’ benefits to disaster response in Africa

Schengen is losing ground fast revealing Europe’s clear inability to deal with migration crisis

Reception conditions for asylum-seekers agreed between MEPs and Council

Zuckerberg, a paella, and the mighty EU questionnaires that would stop Whatsapp acquisition by Facebook?

How India will consume in 2030: 10 mega trends

Bankers don’t go to jail because they are more equal than us all

US – Russia bargain on Syria, Ukraine but EU kept out

Mobile 360 Series – Russia & CIS: Empowering the Digital Economy

Action needed to end deadly clashes between African herders and farmers: UN chief

The time for cities to get smart is now

The missiles fired against Damascus, Syria divided Europe deeply

Youth Internationalization: part of everyday life in JADE

Germany to help China in trade disputes with Brussels

Germany is the world’s most innovative economy

4 steps towards wiping out cervical cancer

UN chief ‘following very closely’ reports of chemical weapons use in Syria’s Aleppo

5 ways blockchain can transform the world of impact investing

We could be sleepwalking into a new crisis. How should the business world prepare?

Donald Trump’s victory is a great opening for global EU leadership on the sustainability agenda

UN calls for support to implement Central Africa’s newly minted peace agreement

German opposition win in Lower Saxony felt all over Europe

Germany loses leading export place

EU agricultural production no more a self-sufficiency anchor

MEPs back plans to halt spread of drug resistance from animals to humans

Superbugs: MEPs advocate further measures to curb use of antimicrobials

Britain heading to national schism on exit from EU

Vaccine hesitancy: a pregnancy related issue?

EU deal on electricity market rules to benefit both consumers and environment

FROM THE FIELD: South Sudan’s green shoots, highlight environmental recovery from war

ECB: Growth measures even before the German elections

More women than ever before are running for political office in the US

The European Union’s Balkan Double Standard

The “Legend of the Sun” wishes you Happy Chinese New Year 2015 from Brussels

Social entrepreneurs can change the world – but these 6 things are holding us back

Migration crisis update: Greece could probably say goodbye to Schengen really soon

Innovation is the key to the pay-TV industry’s long-term growth

Bureaucracy in the member states again the obstacle for long due strong European Hedge Funds

EU car manufacturers worry about an FTA with Japan

Why Eurozone needs a bit more inflation

Chart of the day: These are the cities where the World Cup threatens productivity the most

Crimea, a wicked game of political chess and a ‘big’ coincidence

Art has the power to change the world, says this renowned Iranian muralist

Infinite Oath

G7 summit: Trump Vs. G6 leaders on trade and climate change

Who really cares about the 26.2 million of EU jobless?

Euro celebrates its 20th birthday

World cannot be transformed without ‘ingenuity of the countries of the South’: UN Chief

Making the most of the Sustainable Development Goal 3: its overlooked role in medical education

ECB reaches the boundaries of its mandate to revive the entirety of Eurozone

South Sudan’s women caught up in ‘futile man’s war’ UN gender equality chief

Japan initiates WTO dispute complaint against Korean duties on steel

Fear casts again a cold, ugly shadow over Europe; Turkey sides with Russia

Is there a drug for every disease?

A Sting Exclusive: “Climate change-the biggest global health threat of the 21st century, yet overlooked in climate negotiations?” IFMSA wonders from COP21 in Paris

Parliament backs a modernised EU electoral law

Bitpay @ TheNextWeb 2014: Innovation’s Best Friend

Basel III rules relaxed: Banks got it all but become more prone to crisis

What will it take for the world’s third-largest economy to empower women?

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s