How to measure the ecological performance of cities so people and nature can thrive

(Credit: Unsplash)

This article is brought to you thanks to the collaboration of The European Sting with the World Economic Forum.

Author: Jonny Hughes, IUCN Urban Alliance Chair and WCMC Chief Executive Officer, UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre & Lena Chan, Senior Director, International Biodiversity Conservation Division, National Parks Board

  • We are now an urban animal – 68% of humanity will live in urban areas by 2050.
  • Addressing the health of nature in cities is key to our well-being and prosperity.
  • The IUCN Urban Nature Index and the Singapore Index on Cities’ Biodiversity have been created to help mayors, city leaders and communities achieve a nature-positive future by 2030.

Cities can work for both people and nature, but they rarely do. Why is this? Part of the answer lies in our long-term failure to pull together truly interdisciplinary teams – planners, ecologists, architects, engineers, social scientists, artists and citizens of all ages – when creating or improving new urban neighbourhoods and places.

These specialisms too often clash rather than combine. So, while there is a growing list of inspiring case studies that show the substantial and socio-economic benefits that flow when we successfully pair brilliant ecological design with excellence in placemaking, such examples remain the exception, not the rule. But there is something else missing in addition to a deficit of interdisciplinarity.

In the coming weeks and months, the world’s governments will be signing off frameworks to tackle the twin nature and climate crises. These frameworks will contain globally agreed sets of outcomes, actions, and science-based targets to avert planetary collapse.

Whilst there are some important provisions for biodiversity contained within the New Urban Agenda and, more recently, the Edinburgh Process for Subnational and Local Governments on the Development of the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework, there is currently no international convention on sustainable cities per se. Mayors and city leaders therefore need robust, science-based standards within which they can measure urban nature and set targets towards a nature-positive future.

What is the Urban Nature Index and how does it work?

Networks such as C40 Cities have done an exceptional job in linking cities on the climate agenda, with C40 alone connecting 97 of the world’s largest cities to take climate action in line with the Paris Agreement. Whilst this tentative progress on climate targets for cities is welcome, there remains an urgent need to put something similar in place for nature, underpinned by credible science-based targets.

It was this need that motivated 1,400 government and NGO members of the IUCN (International Union for the Conservation of Nature) to call for the establishment of an IUCN Urban Alliance. Over the past three years the Alliance has drawn experts from IUCN Members and Commissions and representatives of 28 local governments to develop a new global standard called the IUCN Urban Nature Index (UNI).

The UNI is now in an advanced stage of development with piloting ongoing initially in five cities – Curridabat, Lagos, Mexico City, Paris, and Singapore. The UNI addresses head-on the need for a standardised set of robust science-based indicators and baselines from which targets can be set to protect, restore and sustainably use nature in the context of the city. Nature

What is the World Economic Forum doing about nature?

Biodiversity loss and climate change are occurring at unprecedented rates, threatening humanity’s very survival. Nature is in crisis, but there is hope. Investing in nature can not only increase our resilience to socioeconomic and environmental shocks, but it can help societies thrive.

There is strong recognition within the Forum that the future must be net-zero and nature-positive. The Nature Action Agenda initiative, within the Platform for Accelerating Nature-based Solutions, is an inclusive, multistakeholder movement catalysing economic action to halt biodiversity loss by 2030.

Dynamic and flourishing natural ecosystems are the foundation for human wellbeing and prosperity. The Future of Nature and Business report found that nature-positive transitions in key sectors are good for the economy and could generate up to $10.1 trillion in annual business value and create 395 million jobs by 2030.

To support these transitions, the Platform for Accelerating Nature-based Solutions has convened a community of Champions for Nature promoting the sustainable management of the planet for the good of the economy and society. The Nature Action Agenda also recently launched the 100 Million Farmers initiative, which will drive the transition of the food and agriculture system towards a regenerative model, as well as the BiodiverCities by 2030 initiative to create an urban development model that is in harmony with nature.

Get in touch if you would like to collaborate on these efforts or join one of our communities.

The UNI comprises six themes: consumption drivers, human pressures, habitat status, species status, nature’s contributions to people and governance indicators. Each theme has a set of five indicator topics which, once assessed, provide a baseline on which targets can be set for each of the six themes.

The UNI recognises that the ecological footprints of cities extend far beyond their boundaries, encompassing the immediate urban sphere but also the city-bioregional sphere and global spheres where cities have significant telecoupled impacts and dependencies. The UNI combines this “three sphere” approach with the established Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response framework to help make sense of the complexity and underlying drivers in urban-ecological systems.

When complete, the UNI will provide every city mayor or leader in the world with a cost-effective simple method for setting robust, transparent and science-based targets to protect and restore nature within and beyond their city. As baselines are assessed and targets are set, the IUCN Urban Alliance will also collate data from across the world in a central platform in order to track trends in urban ecosystem recovery, reporting these into global reporting frameworks such as the Sustainable Development Goals and the Global Biodiversity Framework as well as sharing learning through its extensive network of members and partners.

Singapore Index: evaluating and monitoring biodiversity conservation efforts

The UNI builds on and complements the pioneering work of the Singapore Index on Cities’ Biodiversity, a self-assessment tool for cities to evaluate and monitor the progress of their biodiversity conservation efforts over time. The Singapore Index comprises three components: native biodiversity in the city; ecosystem services provided by biodiversity and governance; and management of biodiversity. Those cities wishing to go delve into a deeper understanding of the management of biodiversity within their city jurisdiction will find the Singapore Index an invaluable practical tool. The Singapore Index has been implemented by over 50 cities spread across the globe for the past 12 years. An updated version with indicators relevant to current times can be found in the Handbook on the Singapore Index on Cities’ Biodiversity that be downloaded from and

Those cities wishing to set science-based targets for natural capital assets within the city more broadly, and understand their telecoupled impacts beyond city boundaries, will find the UNI a similarly valuable tool. Undoubtedly however, implementing the two indices together, with the Singapore Index providing a level of detail on biodiversity to complement the UNI, is an approach most likely to generate the greatest insights to inform management actions.

DPSIR Model for Urban Natural Capital. Source: UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre.
DPSIR Model for Urban Natural Capital. Source: UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre.

Implementing both indices to create nature-positive cities

Rolling out both the IUCN Urban Nature Index and Singapore Index is now urgent if we are to systematically transform the health of urban ecosystems and shift city footprints from nature-negative to nature-positive. Networks such as the World Economic Forum’s Global Commission on BiodiverCities by 2030, the Science-based Targets Network and the ICLEI-led CitiesWithNature platform will be key to achieving this. ICLEI in particular, have the “boots on the ground” to ensure these tools get into the hands of mayors and city officials, coupled with the expertise to build capacity and work directly with cities to deploy effective nature-based solutions in urban environments.

Having robust indices is one thing, following them up so they unlock transformative change will require us to unleash the collaborative and innovative power that lies within our networks. If we do this, by 2030 most of the world’s cities will be working systematically towards measurable targets for nature and reaping the health, well-being and economic benefits that will accompany the nascent ecological revolution soon to take place in our cities.

The IUCN Urban Alliance is supported by Arcadia, a fund of Lisbet Rausing and Peter Baldwin.

Leave a Reply to How to measure the ecological performance of cities so people and nature can thrive – The European Sting | Prometheism Transhumanism Post Humanism Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: