Trump badly cornered at home by agribusiness and steel consumer lobbies: Trade

US President, Donald Trump (on the left) and Enrique Peña Nieto, President of Mexico, met in Hamburg Germany last week, for the G20 Summit. The two didn’t have an easy encounter, when trade came on the table. (German government work).

Donald Trump, the real estate mogul and TV reality show star, as President, discovered the hard way that international trade is a much more complicated issue than he could have ever imagined. His poor cognitive abilities and his rampant nature didn’t allow him to realize that international trade is a much more complex issue, than producing goods and making money out of selling them abroad. The economic, financial, business, legal, political, historical, geographical and social complexities governing international trade totally escaped the New York contractor.

This week Trump was badly cornered by the huge American agribusiness and steel consumer lobbies, the result of the lobbies’ growing negative feeling towards the President, who now cry loudly against his catastrophic statements about imposing import quotas and tariffs.  The powerful agribusiness lobby doesn’t chew their words. As for the big business groups consuming imported steel, they do not want to be seen openly contradicting the White House. The representatives of the agribusiness, however, directly accuse the President of planning to undermine their jobs and means of living.

Between Scylla and Charybdis

According to a Reuters report, Joe Schuele, a spokesman for the U.S. Meat Export Federation in Denver, Colorado said “…some other sectors of our economy are given better terms and in exchange for that agriculture tariffs would be reintroduced”. In short, meat exporters accuse the White House of preparing to ‘sell’ the animal husbandry sector, in order to gain better terms for the exports of other sectors, like manufacturing, or geographical areas of the US, which vote more massively for Trump. In short, the representatives of the farm sector and the downward businesses fear that the Trump administration is ready to support manufacturing by undermining their interests.

This is not at all far from the truth because the US, if renegotiates the 23 years old North American Free Trade Agreement, the famous NAFTA with Mexico and Canada, cannot expect to win on all fronts. In these games it’s always the same, ‘you lose some you win some’, you cannot have it all. Then the crucial question will be, which sector’s exports will be sacrificed in order to get better terms for another. Canada won’t be an easy interlocutor about renegotiating NAFTA with the US, because it has already signed a major all inclusive free trade deal with the European Union.

Damage already done

Anyway Trump’s unrestricted garrulousness about the ‘America first’ principle in reshaping the US foreign trade, has already started to harm the country’s exports. In the case of NAFTA, the uncertainties about the future have forced Mexico to look elsewhere in the world for supplies, currently covered by American exports of beef, pork and poultry meat, dairy products, wheat, maize, barley etc. The European Union is more than eager to cover Mexico‘s needs in the agrifood sector.

It’s very simple. Protecting, for example, US manufacturing with additional tariffs, will be exchanged in negotiations by reciprocal Mexican tariffs on US exports of animal husbandry products. The current NAFTA arrangement that Trump wants to change, offers full access to the huge Mexican and Canada markets for US farm exports.

It’s as hard as steel

Passing now on to the sector of steel and steel products, things are even more complicated. During his 2016 election campaign Trump promised to introduce import quotas and impose tariffs on excess incoming quantities. Given that the imported products are cheaper than the home produced, if this will be the case, steel and steel products will become more expensive for American buyers. In practice, however, all the key sectors of the US productive constellation, like energy, the automotive industry, mechanical and civil engineering works, infrastructure projects and construction in general use both home and imported steel and steel products.

In all those sectors there are huge corporations with direct access to Washington’s establishment, by operating or employing powerful lobby organizations. Their strong argument is that while the US steel industry employs around 150,000 workers, all the sectors who will be hit by the more expensive steel and steel products offer good jobs to more than ten million people. And this without counting the additional cost the consumers of end products will be obliged to pay, due to the increased input costs. By the same token, the US exports of all industries which use steel and steel products as inputs will be also hit by increased costs.

Political charlatanism

Yet, the case of steel was a benchmark for Trump’s electoral populist verbalism back in 2016. He used this example to amplify beyond recognition his argument about the, arguably, totally corrupt and utterly inefficient Washington establishment. According to this populist construction, the establishment had repudiated the ‘interests of the American people’, by exporting their jobs to Mexico, China and Europe, through seriously detrimental and badly negotiated trade deals.

Wrong perceptions

Obviously, the perception Trump had for steel as described by this word loaded with meaning, was much different than what steel means today for the American economy. Undoubtedly, the US is currently fuelled by high technology and financial services. In short, Trump’s wrong cathexis about what his country is today, seems to be completely outdated and, for that, highly dangerous. Unfortunately, it turns out, that a large part of his electoral audience suffered from the same illusions as him and he duly exploited that.

Now, though, that Trump is gradually brought down to reality by the interventions and the influence of powerful lobbies, he must feel trapped between a rock and a hard place. On the one hand he has to compromise his key electoral promise and, on the other, he cannot endanger the farm sector and the steel using (buying) industries, which constitute the heart of the American productive machinery.

Bush did it

George W. Bush in 2002, during the second year of his first administration unilaterally imposed additional tariffs on steel imports. Soon the countries which were hit, retaliated by levying import taxes on US exports, to such an extent as to finally force Washington to withdraw the extra levies. After a few years, the US steel industry lost tens of thousands of jobs, which wouldn’t have been lost hadn’t Bush started this trade war.

In conclusion, the options are clear. Trump can either imitate his Republican predecessor and undermine what he hypocritically wants to protect, or do nothing and loose face by abandoning his banner electoral promise. Reportedly, he will do both. In any case it’s too dear a price for a lesson on international trade, but Trump, being a total charlatan, doesn’t seem to care much. It will be his country and countrymen to pay the cost, while his personal wealth will surely be much greater when leaving the White House than when he came in. Unfortunately, the populism of politicians is always detrimental for the people who it is meant to support.

 

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

Advertising

the sting Milestone

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

The world needs a grand coalition to tackle climate change

Killings and violence targeting ethnic group in DR Congo ‘may amount to crimes against humanity’

Dignified and non-discriminatory heath care: does anyone even know what it means?

Energy: EU priority projects should be aligned with 2050 climate objectives

Can we balance conservation and development? Science says yes

Denouncing attacks against Baghdad protesters, UN warns ‘violence risks placing Iraq on dangerous trajectory’

UN spotlights digitization of audiovisual archives to preserve human history on World Day

UN climate panel says ‘unprecedented changes’ needed to limit global warming to 1.5°C

South Sudan: ‘Horrific acts’ by government may constitute ‘war crimes’ says UN, demanding justice

Eurozone: Negative statistics bring deflation and recession closer

Tax Inspectors Without Borders making significant progress toward strengthening developing countries’ ability to effectively tax multinational enterprises

The Cold War had an unintended side effect: It created a European wildlife paradise

The Council of Europe adopts Recommendation on young people’s access to rights

Banking Union: Non-performing loans in the EU continue to decline

End ‘shame, isolation and segregation’ of fistula sufferers, urges UN reproductive health chief

Bigotry ‘moving at lightning speed’ Guterres warns, as UN marks the Holocaust

Capital markets selloff: The financial moguls send messages to monetary authorities

‘BioSolar Leaves’ are better at cleaning the air than trees, say the technology’s developers

Over 80 per cent of schools in anglophone Cameroon shut down, as conflict worsens

Is the West gradually losing Africa?

Is Data Privacy really safe seen through Commissioner’s PRISM?

Imported and EU fisheries products should be treated equally

Who is to profit from the quasi announced ECB rate cut?

This is what a planet-wide network of ocean sanctuaries could look like

World ‘not yet on track’ to ensure children a better future: UN rights chief

UN agency sounds alarm: Dwindling agrobiodiversity ‘severe threat’ to food security

Strengthening security through an EU-wide information system

Here’s what you need to know about Bangladesh’s rocketing economy

EU attempts to make new deal with Turkey as relations deteriorate

The reason the world showed limited empathy to the Orlando victims

UN health agency spotlights stalled effort to close health divide across Europe, in new report

Is this the way to finally beat corruption?

These 2 teenagers have helped change the law on plastic pollution in Indonesia

Russia must urgently step up fight against foreign bribery

UN Afghan Mission ‘outraged’ by deadly Taliban attack in Kabul, as hardline group threatens election violence

Alice in Colombia

This tech company is aiming to plant 500 billion trees by 2060 – using drones

D-Day for Grexit is today and not Friday; Super Mario is likely to kill the Greek banks still today

European banking stress tests 2014: A more adverse approach for a shorter banking sector

COP25: Support business efforts to tackle climate change, urges Guterres

Policymakers can ensure the 4IR is fairer than the last three

From Sweden to India, School climate strikes have gone global

The way to entrepreneurship in the developing world

Virtual Doctor: a core part of modern healthcare?

Syria: UN chief welcomes first aid convoy to Rukban camp since January, joint agency operation assists 50,000

Corporate bond debt continues to pile up

Data is the fuel of mobility. Don’t spill it for nothing

Austria’s EU Presidency: Chancellor Sebastian Kurz aims to “build bridges”

Lebanon: UN rights office calls for de-escalation of protest violence

Climate activist Greta Thunberg urges MEPs to put words into action

Electronic or conventional cigarettes – which is safer?

Better outreach to citizens needed to improve effectiveness of European Commission’s public consultations, say Auditors

This is what a Green New Deal for Europe could look like

How Africa and Asia are joining forces on universal healthcare

EU Commission says falling labour remuneration leads to deflation and damages growth prospects

EU trade agreements deliver on growth and jobs, support sustainable development

Banks get trillions and the unemployed ECB’s love…

How trade wars pose a threat to the global economy

Chart of the day: The internet has a language diversity problem

OECD, UN Environment and World Bank call for a radical shift in financing for a low-carbon, climate-resilient future

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s