Intel, Almunia and 1 billion euros for unfair potatoes

Intel Logo

“The General Court upholds the fine of 1.06 billion euros ($ 1.4 billions) imposed on Intel for having abused its dominant position on the market for x86 central processing units between 2002 and 2007”. With these words the judge of the General Court of the European Union dismissed Intel’s action against the decision of the Commission in its entirety last week. The record fine closed a long antitrust question between the US microchip giant and the European Commission.

Let’s see now how the American giant played an unfair game in the European market. With a decision taken on 13 May 2009 the Commission imposed a fine of €1.06 billion on Intel, the American microchip manufacturer, for having abused its dominant position on the market for x86 CPUs, in infringement of the competition rules of the EU and the European Economic Area (EEA), the court explained in a press release.

Europe fined Intel, which had a market share of around 70 percent in 2009, for impeding AMD’s ability to compete between October 2002 and October 2007. The European Commission argued that Intel acted in an ‘unfair’ way “by implementing a strategy aimed at foreclosing from the market its only serious competitor, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.”. Intel was basically awarding rebates to computer makers like Dell and HP, if they bought exclusively or mostly Intel-made CPUs, the most important bit of the computer you are reading this article through. The Commission considered that Intel was in a dominant position and that it was extremely difficult for competitors to enter the market and to expand.

Allegedly Intel also made payments to computer makers (HP, Acer and Lenovo), if they agreed to postpone or cancel the launch of computers that contained CPUs made by AMD, and/or putting restrictions on the distribution of those products, EU officials claimed. Intel has argued that it was not working outside the frames of the law and said to Reuters that “it’s a complex case” that cannot be broken down that easily. Intel, through the voice of its spokeswoman Sophie Jacobs, declared that there’s big “disappointment with the decision”. “None of the arguments raised by Intel supports the conclusion that the fine imposed is disproportionate,” the Court replied, given also that DG Competition fines for anti-trust violations can reach a maximum of 10 percent of a company’s annual turnover, if that is found ‘guilty’. For Intel, the penalty was equivalent to 4.8 percent of the company’s 2008 turnover. So they should be happy already.

The Commission openly welcomed the outcome last week and so did BEUC, the European Consumer Organisation (BEUC stands for French “Bureau Européen des Unions de Consommateurs”). Monique Goyens, BEUC’s Director General commented: “When large companies abuse their dominance of the market, it causes direct harm to consumers. The Court’s ruling issued a strong reminder that such behaviour is illegal and unacceptable. Antitrust actions can help clean the market and this record fine should serve as an expensive deterrent against companies abusing oversized market shares”, BEUC reported.

Intel’s fine remains the largest ever for breaching Europe’s competition laws. The European Commission has been thoroughly monitoring the technology industry. It has already launched antitrust cases against Google and Microsoft, and continues to say that it will “police the technology industry where necessary”. Silicon Valley is trembling not without a reason.

There are always two ways to look at it though. This might be seen as a fight between the ‘free market’ in which a company does everything possible to gain market share and a watchdog which tries to keep the market controlled. However, what should be well considered is that Intel was not found ‘innocent’ for a good reason; the Californian company actually tried to control the market itself, not being the ‘free market’ champion, again, but  the one that wanted to control the market in a ‘monopolistic’ manner. Some say that DG Competition has not accurately considered the economic effects of Intel’s decision through the years, but the truth is that when there is evidence of a long term ‘unfair’ strategy, a market is no longer free and authorities are called to draw the line. This is not Europe’s innovative breakthrough but every free market’s role in the world.

The question many are asking is whether 1 billion euros is too much a fine. Or too low maybe? BEUC’s Monique Goyens last week probably introduced the most important aspect for this kind of questions: “Consumers harmed by Intel’s long-lasting misconduct were left out of any compensation”. Are consumers truly free when several years later an antitrust case is proved to have been influencing the market and its terms?

It’s easy to forget that the most important thing in a market which can call itself “free” is not only the freedom of an entrepreneurial mind to make ambitious business plans without asking his mom but also equally important is the freedom of choice of the consumer of the market. Europe has long been a champion in protecting its consumers by setting high standards and instead of everyone attacking Almunia and his team maybe they need to be more transparent and fair in their price strategies and business development plans.

Everyone if free to conquer the world market with chips or potatoes against competitors but only in a way that does not kill the market. Good competition ethics by giants like Intel, Microsoft and Google is a must in Europe. Only like that products can be of the highest standards, the price as low as possible and only then the consumer will be able to do the impossible, make a rational purchase decision. At least she will try.

the sting Milestones

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

Why precision medicine won’t transform healthcare – but governance could

Czech PM should resolve his conflict of interest as a matter of urgency say MEPs

One is not born, but rather becomes, a woman

The global economy is woefully unprepared for biological threats. This is what we need to do

Daughter of 2019 Sakharov Prize winner Ilham Tohti receives prize on his behalf

Perspective on the policy of disinformation in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic

State aid: Commission approves €1.25 billion German measure to recapitalise TUI

The challenges of Chinese investment in Latin America

Commission introduces surveillance of imports of bioethanol, and remains open to examining requests from other sectors

Mergers: Commission approves acquisition of joint control over Prosegur Alarmas by Telefónica and Prosegur

Climate change takes toll on Zimbabwe’s natural habitat, UN deputy chief observes

Fight against gender inequality in medicine: Brazilian women physians working at the frontline of COVID-19

When connectivity is not enough: the key to meaningful digital inclusion

State aid: Commission approves €300 million public support for the development of ultrafast broadband network in Greece

Banks can achieve net-zero pledge by 2050. Here’s how

A guide to thriving in the post-COVID-19 workplace

‘Multiplicity’ of rights violations in Ukraine as fifth winter of conflict bites

Preparing for developing countries the ‘Greek cure’

Donald Tusk presents EU summit conclusions for last time

State aid: Commission approves €500 million Greek aid scheme to support uncovered fixed costs of companies affected by coronavirus outbreak

These are the world’s best universities for recycling and sustainability

Speeches of Vice Premier LIU He and Vice President of the European Commission Jyrki Katainen at the Press Conference of the Seventh China-EU High-level Economic and Trade Dialogue

IPCC reports devastating climate consequences; US in denial while EU does not fully support the 2050 net zero emissions target

YO!Fest back in Strasbourg for the 2nd edition of the European Youth Event – 20-21 May 2016

A Sting Exclusive: Young people are right about climate change; it’s time to listen

Beyond self-regulation: dealing with Europe’s consumption problem

Managing third-party risks? Here’s how a holistic approach can help

Activist investors are more powerful than ever. Here’s what that means for the economy

Satellites and data are going to help us phase out fossil fuels. Here’s how

The importance and the need of mobile technology in the health care system and in saving lives.

The economic effects of the COVID-19 coronavirus around the world

Schengen: new rules for temporary checks at national borders

Brexit: the time has come to back the withdrawal deal

A new era of computing is coming. How can we make sure it is sustainable?

The three sins the EU committed in 2015

Antimicrobial resistance: how can an intersectoral approach between society and healthcare professionals be developed and applied?

Why we need artists who strive for social change

Here are three ways Africa’s youth are defeating corruption

AI technologies must prevent discrimination and protect diversity

Gender equality: an issue much talked about but less acted upon

Economic Outlook: Weak trade and investment threaten long-term growth

Tuberculosis infections declining, but not fast enough among poor, marginalised: UN health agency

US-China trade war: Washington now wants control of the renminbi-yuan

COVID-19 Therapeutics Strategy: Commission identifies five promising candidate therapeutics

Business is a crucial partner in solving the mental health challenge

Tech must embrace teamwork to transform the world

UN experts urge United Arab Emirates to release terminally ill woman to live her last days ‘in dignity’

The mental domain in times of a pandemic

UN food agency begins ‘last resort’ partial withdrawal of aid to opposition-held Yemeni capital

Don’t compare data to oil – digitization needs a new mindset

How TV has brought mental health issues into the light – and helped to banish stigma

IMF: European banks do not perform their duty to real economy

De Gucht: More gaffes with the talks on the EU-US free trade agreement

Innovations in reusable packaging need a playbook. Here’s why

What the world will look like after the Iran and 5+1 deal; the US emerges as major power broker in Middle East

Climate change will never be combatted by EU alone while some G20 countries keep procrastinating

How India’s new consumers can contribute to a $6 trillion opportunity

How data residency laws can harm privacy, commerce and innovation – and do little for national security

Sustainable Development Goals: making the world a better place

Europe votes against GMOs but the Council votes for TTIP

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: