€5 billion of EU energy efficiency project money spent on “comfort”

Press conference by Harald Wögerbauer, Member of the European Court of Auditors (on the left), on the cost-effectiveness of Cohesion Policy investments in energy efficiency. (EC Audiovisual Services)

Press conference by Harald Wögerbauer, Member of the European Court of Auditors (on the left), on the cost-effectiveness of Cohesion Policy investments in energy efficiency. (EC Audiovisual Services)

The European Commission does not spare big words and photographic opportunities for Commissioners, whenever launching a new initiative or securing political agreement for a regulation. And they are doing this all the time. It seems like they spent all their energy and resources in conceiving new rules on everything. And of course they always need more personnel to write down all those new proposals.

What about results? Very rarely we see announcements about the results achieved after some years of application of a certain regulation. It will be a very interesting subject even for a PhD degree research, to count how many new rules, initiatives and spending programmes the Commission is announcing every year and how many debriefings on the achievements or the failures of the old ones are being organised in the Berlaymont building. Thank God there is the European Court of Auditors (ECA) which monitors regularly all EU legislation that entails spending of EU taxpayers’ money.

Energy efficiency

Incidentally it was yesterday 14 January 2013 when the ECA announced the findings of its audits on energy efficiency projects in a number of EU member states, which cost €5 billion. Of course the Brussels Commission had approved everything and all those “investments” were realised according to the rules set by the relevant EU legislation, introduced and monitored by the Commission.

What was the outcome of all those costly projects? Let the ECA speak: “EU Energy Efficiency investment targets not achieved; average pay back period exceeds 50 years (in extreme cases 150 years)”.

There is more on that from the ECA:”…the European Union, through its Cohesion Policy funds, spent almost €5 billion for co-financing energy efficiency measures in the Member States. The European Commission and the Member States are both responsible for the sound financial management of these funds…The Court found that the projects selected by Member State authorities for financing did not have rational objectives in terms of cost-effectiveness, i.e. cost per unit of energy saved. Their objectives were to save energy and improve comfort, but they were not selected for financing on the basis of their potential to produce financial benefits through energy savings, but rather that the buildings were typically regarded as being ‘ready’ for funding, if they were in need of refurbishment and their documentation complied with the requirements”.

Mind you the “documentation complied with the requirements”, says the Court’s auditor, so the responsibility lies entirely on the Commission side, because it was its services that wrote down those requirements and approved their application.

The Press Release of the ECA fortunately found a place in the Europa>Newsroom internet location, but understandably there were no celebrations by the co-responsible Commissioner Günther Oettinger.

More projects

On the other hand this last Commission member dully celebrated some time ago the political agreement on the new Energy Efficiency Directive. He must have been very proud of it. Commissioners are always proud in announcements. He made however no reference to what had happened to €5bn of European taxpayers’ money, which was used not for energy efficiency projects as it was planned by the Commission, but rather to “improve comfort”. Seemingly the EU Commission is always seduced by comfort.

The ECA however doesn’t stop here. Its Press Release continues as follows: ““None of the projects we looked at had a needs assessment or even an analysis of the energy savings potential in relation to investments”, said Harald Wögerbauer, the ECA member responsible for the report, “The Member States were essentially using this money to refurbish public buildings while energy efficiency was, at best, a secondary concern.”

And all that with the seal of the Brussels Commission, otherwise there would have being no disbursement of funds. It is an appalling fact, the ECA to have found that €5bn had being spent on “comfort” and “refurbishments”, totally outside the scope of the programme they meant to finance and the European Commission did nothing to change this.

That kind of money is a good part of the annual EU budget and actually they went down the drain. Is it possible that nobody can be held responsible for that? It might not be a penal case but aren’t there some internal rules in the Commission’s statutes for the waste of €5bn?

 

the sting Milestones

Featured Stings

Can we feed everyone without unleashing disaster? Read on

These campaigners want to give a quarter of the UK back to nature

How to build a more resilient and inclusive global system

Stopping antimicrobial resistance would cost just USD 2 per person a year

The 13th round of TTIP negotiations hits a wall of intense protests and growing concerns

Digital Day 2021: EU countries commit to key digital initiatives for Europe’s Digital Decade

Provisional agreement on temporary rules to detect and remove online child abuse

COP21 Breaking News_03 December: UNFCCC Secretariat Launches Forest Information Hub

Gaza probe finds ‘reasonable grounds’ Israeli forces committed international human rights violations

Inclusion and diversity isn’t just good for employees – it’s good for the bottom line

Conquering COVID-19 through Collaboration

Commission’s action plan: financial world mandatory links to environmental targets

Over 80 per cent of schools in anglophone Cameroon shut down, as conflict worsens

EU Cohesion Policy invests over €1.4 billion in green projects in 7 Member States

The race for Driverless vehicles: where is the industry heading?

These islands are using tourists to help offset the effects of tourism

UNcomplicating the UN: a new podcast is born over coffee in New York

Two rhythms and a sharpened pencil: how art can help us heal and make sense of the world

The refugee crisis seen through the eyes of a young doctor from Turkey

AIESEC @ European Business Summit 2014: European Youth, Change Now Patiently

How the US should react to the pandemic, according to Bill Gates

The South China Sea Arbitration: Illegal, Illegitimate and Invalid

EU: Protecting victims’ rights from cartels and market abuses

Conference on the Future of Europe: Engaging with citizens to build a more resilient Europe

Deadly violence at Israel-Gaza border escalates dangerously: UN chief condemns in strongest terms

Eastern Partnership: a renewed agenda for recovery, resilience and reform underpinned by an Economic and Investment plan

To make it cybersecure, CEOs must truly get to know their business

Parliament: Last compromise on bank single resolution mechanism

A Sting Exclusive, the European Commissioner for Energy Günther Oettinger writes for the Sting on “EU Industry: a major energizer”

Women Win in the West

Consumers’ rights against defective digital content agreed by EU lawmakers

Impressive African health gains at risk from changing trends: WHO report

Forward Agenda: What can we expect from 2019?

Parliament seals ban on throwaway plastics by 2021

UN chief condemns attack in south-west Iran which killed dozens

Five years down the drain

The AI moment: preparing for the revolution

New Mozambique storm rips off roofs, brings lashing rain as aid response kicks in

Tourism offers much to the EU gets a little

Von der Leyen on Coronavirus Global Response: World stands united against coronavirus and will win

Africa’s inspiring innovators show what the future could hold

Asylum seekers in Sri Lanka fear for their safety, in wake of Easter Sunday terror attacks

Pakistan has just planted over a billion trees

Australia now has 25 million people. Will it choose to keep growing?

From Trials to Vials: Ensuring an Equitable Distribution of COVID-19 vaccines

What Ghana can teach us about integrating refugees

Primary Care: a way to provide Palliative Care in Universal Health Coverage

Guterres holds ‘focused and frank’ informal discussions over future of Cyprus

Eight years after Fukushima, nuclear power is making a comeback

Economic uncertainty, geopolitical tensions stall growth in Latin America and Caribbean region, UN says

Waste-free consumption: 3 reasons why cities will lead

Commission welcomes Bulgaria and Croatia’s entry into the Exchange Rate Mechanism II

With potential to boost profits by up to 20 per cent, a woman’s place is at work, says UN labour agency

New seat projections for the next European Parliament EU28

Sassoli: Migration agreement respects fundamental principles of Parliament’s proposal

Walk, cycle, dance and play – UN health agency recommends new action plan for good health

Microplastic and nanoplastic pollution threatens our enviroment. How should we respond?

A call for a new crop of innovators

‘World’s deadliest sea crossing’ claimed six lives a day in 2018: UN refugee agency

Why trade wars have no winners

Assembly of European Regions @ European Business Summit 2014: The European regions on the path to recovery

More than four in 10 women, live in fear of refusing partner’s sexual demands, new UN global study finds

This mobile laundry gives homeless people free showers and washes their clothes

Climate Change: a challenge yet to be tackled in medical schools

More Stings?

Speak your Mind Here

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s